Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4049360
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T13:56:07+00:00 2026-05-20T13:56:07+00:00

I have come across a curious situation involving static generic methods. This is the

  • 0

I have come across a curious situation involving static generic methods. This is the code:

class Foo<E>
{
    public static <E> Foo<E> createFoo()
    {
        // ...
    }
}

class Bar<E>
{
    private Foo<E> member;

    public Bar()
    {
        member = Foo.createFoo();
    }
}

How come I don’t have to specify any type arguments in the expression Foo.createFoo()? Is this some kind of type inference? If I want to be explicit about it, how can I specify the type argument?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T13:56:08+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 1:56 pm

    Yes, this is type inference based on the target of the assignment, as per JLS section 15.12.2.8. To be explicit, you’d call something like:

    Foo.<String>createFoo();
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I come across this a lot, and have always been curious if there is
I have come across the following type of code many a times, and I
I'm learning objective-C and Cocoa and have come across this statement: The Cocoa frameworks
I've just come across this code snippet in some Exchange 2010 code and I
I have come across a strange behavior... In class A, at the viewDidLoad method
I have come across this website: http://www.fetchak.com/ie-css3/ It seems to work when I enter
I have come across a scenario where I have some initialization code on my
I have come across a lot of optimization tips which say that you should
I have come across what must be a common problem. When I have an
I have come across a quirky feature in Visual Studio and I was interested

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.