Question

I have come across an Oracle problem for which I have so far been unable to find the cause.
The query below works in Oracle SQL developer, but when running in .NET it throws:

ORA-01008: not all variables bound

I’ve tried:

• Changing the Oracle data type for lot_priority (Varchar2 or int32).
• Changing the .NET data type for lot_priority (string or int).
• One bind variable name is used twice in the query. This is not a problem in my
  other queries that use the same bound variable in more than one
  location, but just to be sure I tried making the second instance its
  own variable with a different :name and binding it separately.
• Several different ways of binding the variables (see commented code;
  also others).
• Moving the bindByName() call around.
• Replacing each bound variable with a literal. I’ve had two separate variables cause the problem (:lot_pri and :lot_priprc). There were some minor changes I can’t remember between the two. Changing to literals made the query work, but they do need to work with binding.

Query and code follow. Variable names have been changed to protect the innocent:

SELECT rf.myrow floworder, rf.stage, rf.prss,
rf.pin instnum, rf.prid, r_history.rt, r_history.wt
FROM
(
    SELECT sub2.myrow, sub2.stage, sub2.prss, sub2.pin, sub2.prid
    FROM (
        SELECT sub.myrow, sub.stage, sub.prss, sub.pin,
            sub.prid, MAX(sub.target_rn) OVER (ORDER BY sub.myrow) target_row
            ,sub.hflag
        FROM (
            WITH floc AS 
            (
                SELECT flow.prss, flow.seq_num
                FROM rpf@mydblink flow
                WHERE flow.parent_p = :lapp
                AND flow.prss IN (
                    SELECT r_priprc.prss
                    FROM r_priprc@mydblink r_priprc
                    WHERE priprc = :lot_priprc
                )
                AND rownum = 1
            )
            SELECT row_number() OVER (ORDER BY pp.seq_num, rpf.seq_num) myrow,
                rpf.stage, rpf.prss, rpf.pin,
                rpf.itype, hflag,
            CASE WHEN rpf.itype = 'SpecialValue'
                THEN rpf.instruction
                ELSE rpf.parent_p
            END prid,
            CASE WHEN rpf.prss = floc.prss
                AND rpf.seq_num = floc.seq_num
                THEN row_number() OVER (ORDER BY pp.seq_num, rpf.seq_num)
            END target_rn
            FROM floc, rpf@mydblink rpf
            LEFT OUTER JOIN r_priprc@mydblink pp
                ON (pp.prss = rpf.prss)
            WHERE pp.priprc = :lot_priprc
            ORDER BY pp.seq_num, rpf.seq_num
        ) sub
    ) sub2
    WHERE sub2.myrow >= sub2.target_row
    AND sub2.hflag = 'true'
) rf
LEFT OUTER JOIN r_history@mydblink r_history
ON (r_history.lt = :lt
    AND r_history.pri = :lot_pri
    AND r_history.stage = rf.stage
    AND r_history.curp = rf.prid
)
ORDER BY myrow

---

public void runMyQuery(string lot_priprc, string lapp, string lt, int lot_pri) {
Dictionary<int, foo> bar = new Dictionary<int, foo>();
using(var con = new OracleConnection(connStr)) {
    con.Open();

    using(var cmd = new OracleCommand(sql.rtd_get_flow_for_lot, con)) { // Query stored in sql.resx
        try {
            cmd.BindByName = true;
            cmd.Prepare();
            cmd.Parameters.Add(new OracleParameter("lapp", OracleDbType.Varchar2)).Value = lapp;
            cmd.Parameters.Add(new OracleParameter("lot_priprc", OracleDbType.Varchar2)).Value = lot_priprc;
            cmd.Parameters.Add(new OracleParameter("lt", OracleDbType.Varchar2)).Value = lt;
            // Also tried OracleDbType.Varchar2 below, and tried passing lot_pri as an integer
            cmd.Parameters.Add(new OracleParameter("lot_pri", OracleDbType.Int32)).Value = lot_pri.ToString();
            /*********** Also tried the following, more explicit code rather than the 4 lines above: **
            OracleParameter param_lapp
                = cmd.Parameters.Add(new OracleParameter("lapp", OracleDbType.Varchar2));
            OracleParameter param_priprc
                = cmd.Parameters.Add(new OracleParameter("lot_priprc", OracleDbType.Varchar2));
            OracleParameter param_lt
                = cmd.Parameters.Add(new OracleParameter("lt", OracleDbType.Varchar2));
            OracleParameter param_lot_pri
                = cmd.Parameters.Add(new OracleParameter("lot_pri", OracleDbType.Varchar2));
            param_lapp.Value = lastProcedureStackProcedureId;
            param_priprc.Value = lotPrimaryProcedure;
            param_lt.Value = lotType;
            param_lot_pri.Value = lotPriority.ToString();
            //***************************************************************/
            var reader = cmd.ExecuteReader();
            while(reader.Read()) {
                // Get values from table (Never reached)
            }
        }
        catch(OracleException e) {
            //     ORA-01008: not all variables bound
        }
    }
}

---

Why is Oracle claiming that not all variables are bound?

Answer 1

I found how to run the query without error, but I hesitate to call it a “solution” without really understanding the underlying cause.

This more closely resembles the beginning of my actual query:

-- Comment
-- More comment
SELECT rf.flowrow, rf.stage, rf.process,
rf.instr instnum, rf.procedure_id, rtd_history.runtime, rtd_history.waittime
FROM
(
    -- Comment at beginning of subquery
    -- These two comment lines are the problem
    SELECT sub2.flowrow, sub2.stage, sub2.process, sub2.instr, sub2.pid
    FROM ( ...

The second set of comments above, at the beginning of the subquery, were the problem. When removed, the query executes. Other comments are fine.
This is not a matter of some rogue or missing newline causing the following line to be commented, because the following line is a SELECT. A missing select would yield a different error than “not all variables bound.”

I asked around and found one co-worker who has run into this — comments causing query failures — several times.
Does anyone know how this can be the cause? It is my understanding that the very first thing a DBMS would do with comments is see if they contain hints, and if not, remove them during parsing. How can an ordinary comment containing no unusual characters (just letters and a period) cause an error? Bizarre.