Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 600503
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T16:36:47+00:00 2026-05-13T16:36:47+00:00

I have created a library which can download JSON data which is then placed

  • 0

I have created a library which can download JSON data which is then placed into an NSDictionary. I wrap this class with a simple Twitter engine which allows me to pull my friends timeline, post an update and post an update with my GPS location. From my limited experience with Objective-C the way to connect everything is with delegation. I set a delegate property which calls back the asynchronous result to either a selector or a method signature. I can even create an optional or required interface on the delegate which will allow Xcode to assist me a little with implementing the delegate. To learn about using delegates in Objective-C I created this simple project.

http://www.smallsharptools.com/downloads/ObjC/Delegates.zip

It defines a Worker class which allows you to initialize the class with a delegate. When the work is done with the doWork method it looks for a method signature on the delegate to send a message back to it. It uses the following code.

if([[self delegate] respondsToSelector:@selector(workFinished:)]) {
    NSString *msg = @"That's it? Easy!";
    [[self delegate] workFinished:msg];
}

It looks for the workFinished: method to pass back a message. I declared this method signature as an optional interface with the following code in the header, Worker.h.

  @protocol WorkerNotifications
   @optional
   - (void) workFinished: (NSString *) msg;
   @end

You can see the rest of the project from the download for all of the details. But these 2 code snippets show how this delegation pattern works. But with the Twitter class I need to know the context of the method which started an asynchronous action which leads to a callback to a delegate method. If I call the sendUpdate method more than once from the calling class, how I am supposed to know the context of the callback?

Normally with a language like JavaScript, Java or C# I would create an inline closure or anonymous class which would have access to the starting context, but that is not possibly currently with Objective-C on the iPhone. I found that this question was already asked and answered on StackOverflow.

Anonymous delegate implementation in Objective-C?

So what I have done is skip the optional interface and instead passed in a selector which the Twitter class will call when the asynchronous action is completed. A call to start this action looks like…

CMTwitterEngine *engine = [[CMTwitterEngine alloc] initWithDelegate:self];
[engine setSendUpdateFinished:@selector(sendUpdateFinished:)];
[engine setSendUpdateFailed:@selector(sendUpdateFailed:)];
[engine setParsingSendUpdateFailed:@selector(parsingSendUpdateFailed:)];
[engine setUsername:TWITTER_USERNAME pass:TWITTER_PASSWORD];
[engine sendUpdate:statusUpdateText.text];

This code first initializes the engine reference with self as the delegate. To attach the callbacks I send in selectors which I originally had on the sendUpdate method signature but the method calls got pretty long. I opted to simply set properties of the selectors. This all works but I am not sure I like how this is working since it only partially solves my problem.

To complete this example, I finish the asynchronous work and eventually call a method internally which looks for the given selector and calls it if it is defined.

- (void)sendUpdateFinished:(NSDictionary *)dictionary {
    if (self.sendUpdateFinished != nil) {
        [self.delegate performSelector:self.sendUpdateFinished withObject:dictionary];
    }
}

I can pass in the status message to send as a Twitter update but I still do not have the context of the originating call. What if I want to call sendUpdate more than once and the first asynchronous call is still running? And what if the second call finishes first? They will both have self as the delegate so I would have to either track the context somehow or pass them to a different selector to distinguish them, which also does not satisfy my needs. What happens if I have 3 or 4 or 5 asynchronous calls? I need to know which ones were sent successfully and when they are complete.

It appears the only way that I can do all this is to create a class which holds onto all of the properties needed for the context, have that class act as the delegate for the call to the asynchronous Twitter method and then report back to the parent class which is likely UIViewController. I would take this approach but I have not read about this approach or seen any sample code yet which does this.

What would you do? How would you handle multiple asynchronous calls going out which could end in a different order than going out and then process them with context upon completion?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T16:36:47+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 4:36 pm

    I have to second (or third) the previously posted answers in that NSNotificationCenter is probably what you’re looking for here.

    Essentially one typically uses notifications when there are potentially many delegates all of which need to do something in response to a single action or event that has occurred. Think of it as a one-to-many sort of delegation or an implementation of the observer pattern. The basic things to know are:

    1. NSNotifications have a name that you define which is just an NSString. Notifications can be posted by name and objects register to receive notifications by name.

    2. When a notification is posted a notificationSender object and/or userInfo dictionary can be provided. The notificationSender is the direct way of determining who posted a given notification when it is being handled by the receiver. The userInfo is an NSDictionary that can be used to provide additional context info along with the notification.

    So, rather than forcing all of the workers to adopt to an informal protocol and messing around with reflection style calling-methods-at runtime you just register instances of the workers with NSNotificationCenter. Typically the registration with the NSNotificationCenter is done in an init method of each worker class. Instances of each type of worker are then typically set up as “freeze dried” objects in a NIB or can be programatically instantiated in the app delegate so that they get registered with the notification center early on in the app’s life.

    When the thing occurs you post a NSNotification to the NSNotificationCenter (which is essentially a singleton) and then everything else that has registered to receive that particular type of notification will have the method called that was specified to handle that type of notification. When done these methods can then call a common method back on the sender (obtained via NSNotification’s object method) to tell the sender that they’ve completed their work.

    Once each known worker has checked in the the common method on the sender can then go on to whatever post-worker-completion code is to be performed.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have created an app which has a library of images. I have imported
My problem is a simple one. I've created a class library for Delphi 2007
I have created an experimental fast rectangular object tracking system; it will be used
i'm struggling with LLBLGEN and i guess ORM's in general. i have created an
I created a project which includes an mx:ViewStack as it's first container. <?xml version=1.0
My intent is to create a library/API for small scale distributed multi-user game /simulation.
I am writing an executable which uses dlopen() (LoadLibrary() on Windows) to dynamically load
I need to let my Rails app connect to a MS SQL Server database
In Delphi 2009 and Windows API, is there a way to detect that a
I'm building an application that is composed of two projects: common and theApp .

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.