Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 203305
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T17:22:01+00:00 2026-05-11T17:22:01+00:00

I have created a nested list with drag/drop functionality. My issue is that I

  • 0

I have created a nested list with drag/drop functionality. My issue is that I want each nesting to sort in itself. For example:

-first_level
-first_level
 -second_level
 -second_level
-first_level

“First level” should not be able to go into “Second Level” and vice versa. I thought I could do this with the containment option but no dice there. It works with keeping the second levels out of the first level but not the other way around.

Here is my example JS and list:

$("#sort_list").sortable({
  containment: '#sort_list',                                             
  axis: 'y',
  revert: true,
  items: 'li',
  opacity: 0.8
});
$(".sub_list").sortable({ 
  containment: 'parent',
  axis: 'y',
  revert: true,
  items: 'li',
  opacity: 0.8,
});
$("#sort_list").disableSelection();

<ul id="sort_list">
  <li>one</li>
  <li>two
    <ul class="sub_list">
    <li>sub one</li>
    <li>sub two</li>
    </ul>
  </li>
  <li>three</li>
  <li>four</li>
</ul>   

Any ideas? Thanks guys!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T17:22:01+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 5:22 pm

    Okay, looks like I found the problem. I was declaring: items: ‘li’ and so it wasn’t detecting the UL as a container/sortable item. A big thanks to karim79 for helping me think all this through 🙂

    Below is the working code (it’s basically saying “Everyone stay in their own container”):

        $("#sort_list").sortable({
          containment: 'parent',                                                                                     
          axis: 'y',
          revert: true,
          opacity: 0.8
        });
        $(".sub_list").sortable({ 
          containment: 'parent',
          axis: 'y',
          revert: true,
          opacity: 0.8,
        });
        $("#sort_list").disableSelection();
    
        <ul id="sort_list">
          <li>one</li>
          <li>two
            <ul class="sub_list">
            <li>sub one</li>
            <li>sub two</li>
            </ul>
          </li>
          <li>three</li>
          <li>four</li>
        </ul>
    

    Now that we got the “item: li” thing sorted out we can even remove containment: ‘parent’, from the top list without fear of the lists colliding.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 205k
  • Answers 205k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You are registering the instance in the child container, so… May 12, 2026 at 9:02 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer If Lucene.NET is not installed on the server, you will… May 12, 2026 at 9:02 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer So, here's what what going on. The binding has been… May 12, 2026 at 9:02 pm

Related Questions

I've had the same problem with sql for a while and as I sit
I ultimately need a list of import records that include album records which only
I'm trying to create a complex (from my opinion) form, but the process is
I received the following email today from a co-worker. My question is this accurate.

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.