Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8534919
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 11, 20262026-06-11T10:18:32+00:00 2026-06-11T10:18:32+00:00

I have defined a syntax using treetop and most of the values parse fine,

  • 0

I have defined a syntax using treetop and most of the values parse fine, but some look like

Response+Isupport1 offset=0, "...orted by this server" (host,space1,space2,nickname,space3):

… and …

...
SyntaxNode+Isupport0 offset=52, "WATCH=128 " (token,space):
    SyntaxNode+Token0 offset=52, "WATCH=128" (parameter,equals,value):
    ...

What does the SyntaxNode+[Node] mean? How can I fix it to work correctly? Because now, these nodes have the SyntaxNode class, not the Token class (which makes them generic and doesn’t fit my needs).

As far as I can see, defining (token space)+ is what caused this (no idea why).

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-11T10:18:33+00:00Added an answer on June 11, 2026 at 10:18 am

    Your question is very incomplete, which is probably why it didn’t get answered, but as the person who wrote the inspect implementation that produces the above display, I can probably shed light. Treetop creates SyntaxNodes (or an instance of a different class, if you request that), and then augments them with mixin modules that contain your code. You can get multiple modules mixed in to a single node, because a rule that calls only one sub-rule can add a new module to the node returned by that sub-rule. Every type you include a code block starting with {, you get a new module. The parenthesised list of interesting methods at the end of each inspect line have come from these mixins.

    However, as to why your grammar doesn’t work, you’d have to show it to us with your input and expected parse result to get an answer.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have defined the following class using COM to use the IGroupPolicyObject using C#.NET:
I have defined a table type PL/SQL variable and added some data there. create
I have defined a rectangle drawable like this: <shape xmlns:android=http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android android:shape=rectangle> <corners android:radius=4dip/> <solid
I have defined an array like so : var myArray = {myNewArray: ['string1' ,
Im using centos 5.5 and installed vim 7 i defined syntax off in vimrc
I have two objects defined something like this (simplified for sake of the question):
I have a problem using a method defined on a model in CanCan abilities:
Here's a simple function delcared and defined using old style syntax: #include <stdio.h> void
I have a class defined like so: public class AddRecordsToolbar<D extends IDataSource<T>, T extends
I have a bunch of RSpec Rake tasks defined that I'd like to run

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.