Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6760599
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T14:04:58+00:00 2026-05-26T14:04:58+00:00

I have discovered an issue when trying to store a lot of keys using

  • 0

I have discovered an issue when trying to store a lot of keys using python-memcached.
Here is what I’m doing:

import memcache

# This dict has a 2270 entries that is generated on production server
v = eval(open("/home/dragoon/output").read())
a = memcache.Client(['unix:/tmp/memcached.sock'], debug=1)

Next I’m trying to set all these values:

In [94]: len(a.set_multi(v))                                       
MemCached: MemCache: unix:/tmp/memcached.sock: timed out.  Marking dead.
Out[94]: 2270

The log output of the memcached server:

...
27: going from conn_new_cmd to conn_parse_cmd
<27 set d750bde63a98579f9c2987907aaaf5f8 1 0 18
27: going from conn_parse_cmd to conn_nread
> FOUND KEY d750bde63a98579f9c2987907aaaf5f8
>27 STORED
27: going from conn_nread to conn_write
Failed to write, and not due to blocking: Broken pipe
27: going from conn_write to conn_closing
<27 connection closed.

After some time:

In [96]: len(a.set_multi({'test':1}))
Out[96]: 0

In [97]: a.get('test')
Out[97]: 1

Default timeout is 3 seconds, but increasing it even to 100 seconds doesn’t help, memcached is just getting stucked.
So, my question is, what is the problem with memcache?

I saw people talking about storing over 1000 000 entries in it, but for me it can’t even store 2 000?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T14:04:59+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 2:04 pm

    Ok. It seems that there is some bug in memcached 1.4.2 that is the last version in Ubuntu 10.04 LTS.
    Memcached 1.4.5 works fine.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

While debugging an issue with our system, I have discovered a thread contention that
I have discovered some issues in my program. I was using log4j for logging,
I have recently discovered that I am affected by this bug http://www.mail-archive.com/mono-bugs@lists.ximian.com/msg71515.html Well, at
I have a software-hardware related issue that I'm trying to troubleshoot. My app was
I have discovered an interesting issue where a Stored Procedure executes very slowly from
I'm trying to upload an app to app store, and I'm getting a lot
I have been trying to work out an issue with Sagepay server intergration into
I'm trying to implement a fire-and-forget pattern in a WCF method. I have this
I have reviewed quite a few posts on this site concerning this issue with
We have discovered that one of our auto generated assemblies is throwing a StackOverflowException

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.