Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4537570
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 21, 20262026-05-21T14:41:36+00:00 2026-05-21T14:41:36+00:00

I have entities that are managed by Core Data and have several cases where,

  • 0

I have entities that are managed by Core Data and have several cases where, within a single method, I set some attribute values that will result graph changes that Core Data will enforce and perform additional actions that (logically) depend on uptodate state for the graph.

Is there any reason not to call processPendingChanges after each time a relationship is set, to ensure that the graph is always fully uptodate? Everything works as it should when I do this, but, clearly, it’s a bit “noisy”, and breaks up some processing that would otherwise be notifications (e.g, fetched results controllers that end up sending lots of controllerWillChangeContent/controllerDidChangeContent to their deligates when one would otherwise have happened).

ADDITION:

Will the graph always be up-to-date after a return from any method that makes changes to an entity?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-21T14:41:37+00:00Added an answer on May 21, 2026 at 2:41 pm

    processPendingChanges is most often used on iOS with multiple context operating on seperate threads. It plays a bigger and more common role under MacOS.

    You usually don’t have to call it under iOS in most circumstances. Doing so doesn’t really give you much of an advantage and it can cause lags in the UI when executed on the main thread if you have a complex graph.

    I wouldn’t bother with it unless testing reveals you are loosing graph integrity for some reason.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.