Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6698343
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T06:34:00+00:00 2026-05-26T06:34:00+00:00

I have expression: Double getAbs(Double value){ return value> 0 ? value: value== 0 ?

  • 0

I have expression:

Double getAbs(Double value){
return value> 0 ? value: value== 0 ? null : -value;
}

or better:

 Double getAbs(Double value){
return Math.abs(value);
}

I understand that there are some differences about NaN. But method Math.abs(double) – so we have unboxing.
In which case performance better?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T06:34:01+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 6:34 am

    The only “performance” in your code is that the JVM will need to unbox your Double to double.

    Math.abs(double) uses a ternary if statement as follows:

    public static double abs(double a) {
        return (a <= 0.0D) ? 0.0D - a : a;
    }
    

    So, your if statement is no performance worry at all.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there a way to have Expression Language (EL) expressions included JavaScript files be
Let's say I have some code that does some floating point arithmetic and stores
This may be familiar to some. I have a wrapper class Ex that wraps
I have this if expression, void Foo() { System.Double something = GetSomething(); if (something
in my C# program, I have a regular expression textparser, that finds all occurrences
How can I get a string inside double quotes using regular expression? I have
I have a dtsx package with a precedence constraint that evaluates an expression and
We know that VB string start and end with double quotes So we have
I have a code that looks like (more or less) : public void INeedHolidaysNow(double[,]){
Let's say I have the following code snippet: int i; double value; for(i =

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.