Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 5940855
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T16:01:38+00:00 2026-05-22T16:01:38+00:00

I have following classes: abstract class AClass { } class Foo : AClass {

  • 0

I have following classes:

abstract class AClass { }
class Foo : AClass { }
class Bar : AClass { }

And when I am trying to use them:

AClass myInstance;
myInstance = true ? new Foo() : new Bar();

This code won’t compiling because of the “Type of conditional expression cannot be determined because there is no implicit conversion between ‘CSharpTest.Class1.Foo’ and ‘CSharpTest.Class1.Bar'”

But following samples compiling ok:

if (true)
{
    myInstance = new Foo();
}
else
{
    myInstance = new Bar();
}

This is ok too:

myInstance = true ? (AClass) new Foo() : new Bar();

or

myInstance = true ? new Foo() : (AClass) new Bar();

Why there is so big difference in behavior of the conditional operator and if clause?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T16:01:39+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 4:01 pm

    This is the expected behavior.

    Since no implicit conversion exists between X and Y (even if they share a common base, there is no implicit conversion between them), you need to explicitly cast (at least) one of them to the base class so that an implicit conversion exists.

    A detailed explanation from the C# specification:

    The second and third operands of the ?: operator control the type of the conditional expression. Let X and Y be the types of the second and third operands. Then,

    If X and Y are the same type, then this is the type of the conditional expression.

    Otherwise, if an implicit conversion (Section 6.1) exists from X to Y, but not from Y to X,
    then Y is the type of the conditional expression.

    Otherwise, if an implicit conversion (Section 6.1) exists from Y to X, but not from X to Y,
    then X is the type of the conditional expression.

    Otherwise, no expression type can be determined, and a compile-time error occurs.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have several classes like in the following example: abstract class AClass { boolean
Lets say i have the following c# classes: abstract class a { protected abstract
I have the following classes in my Model: public abstract class Entity : IEntity
I'm looking at some Java classes that have the following form: public abstract class
I have the following abstract classes: public abstract class AbSuperClass1<K,S> { //class definition }
I have the following classes: class Repository : IRepository class ReadOnlyRepository : Repository abstract
I have the following classes : public abstract class Item { //... } public
I have the following classes: abstract class DTO{ } class SubscriptionDTO extends DTO {
I have the following classes: public abstract class BaseClass { private readonly double cachedValue;
I have the following classes: abstract class Transport{ protected String name; protected Transport(String name){

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.