Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 825899
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T03:19:41+00:00 2026-05-15T03:19:41+00:00

i have following problem from book introduction algorithm second edition by MIT university problem

  • 0

i have following problem from book introduction algorithm second edition by MIT university

problem is following

An array A[1 . . n] contains all the integers from 0 to n except one. It would be easy
to determine the missing integer in O(n) time by using an auxiliary array B[0 . . n]
to record which numbers appear in A. In this problem, however, we cannot access
an entire integer in A with a single operation. The elements of A are represented
in binary, and the only operation we can use to access them is “fetch the j th bit
of A[i],” which takes constant time.

Show that if we use only this operation, we can still determine the missing integer in O(n) time

please help

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T03:19:42+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 3:19 am

    Call your missing number M.

    You can split your array into two parts depending on whether the least significant bit of A[i] is a 1 or a 0. The smaller of the two parts (call it P_1) is at most (n-1)/2 elements in size, and it tells you whether M‘s least significant bit is a 1 or a 0.

    Now consider the 2nd bit for the elements of P_1. Again, this part can be split in two, and the smaller of the two parts (P_2) tells you whether this bit should be a 1 or a 0.

    Carry on going (P_3, P_4, …) until you’ve worked out what all the bits are.

    You can prove that this is O(n) because you are essentially looking at n + n/2 + n/4 + ... different individual bits in your array, and this sum is less than 2n.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 440k
  • Answers 440k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The only reliable way is to separate use of the… May 15, 2026 at 5:25 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Why not simply like this ? #define LOG(fmt, ...) NSLog(fmt,… May 15, 2026 at 5:25 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer try with this: Enumerable.Empty<Person>().AsQueryable(); May 15, 2026 at 5:25 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.