Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9142921
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 17, 20262026-06-17T09:53:47+00:00 2026-06-17T09:53:47+00:00

I have following problem: I’m searching for similarities. Therefore I have a big source

  • 0

I have following problem:

I’m searching for similarities. Therefore I have a big source table with 200000 entries and second table with 10000 entries. Now I’m retrieving a entry set for each table and compare every row in the source table with every row in the second table in java (I’m using some NeedleMan Gotoh algorithm and similar more complex algorithms). That means 1 billion comparisons and that’s too much and too slow…

The goal is a table with all similarities (id from source table, id from second table and a similarity value) or at least something like the best match (or best x matches) for every entry…

Could anyone give me some advice to do such calculations in a “normal” time?

EDIT

Main Table

---+------+-------------+---------+-------+
id | name | address     | country | plz   | ...
---+------+-------------+---------+-------+
20 | Sony | Main Str. 1 | US      | 10000 |
---+------+-------------+---------+-------+

Second Table

---+------+-------------+---------+-------+
id | name | address     | country | plz   | ...
---+------+-------------+---------+-------+
30 | Soni | MainStr. 1  | US      | 10000 |
---+------+-------------+---------+-------+

Goal (similarity table):

---+---------------+--------------+-----------+
id | id_source_tbl | id_second_tbl| similarity|
---+---------------+--------------+-----------+
1  | 20            | 30           | 0.99      |
---+---------------+--------------+-----------+

simil_value is a value that indicates, how likely the company in the source table is the same as the company in the second table

the result indicates, that the two rows are representing the same company… the two entries just differ because of small typos… (0.99 is the similarity and is very high => companies are the same)
Similarity is calculated with a needleman wunsch gotoh algorithm (comparing char for char and considering position in string and so on… typos should result in a high similarity value)

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-17T09:53:49+00:00Added an answer on June 17, 2026 at 9:53 am

    Actually, I made the problem myself…

    Solution for me was following:
    1) don’t reuse connections, always close them with the corresponing ResultSet
    2) use transactions
    3) split work to threads
    4) if you, like me, have results for single rows (ALL similarities for one single entry) and want to calc something on this subresult (like in my case, for all similarities I wanted to calc the rank), do this in java and use the subresult!!!! instead of doing it afterwards in mysql

    The result for me is about 1 day of calculation time instead of 3 weeks…

    thanks for the help

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have following problem. I have subreport_1, now irrelevant and then subreport_2, with group
i have following problem from book introduction algorithm second edition by MIT university problem
I have following problem: I delete entries when in both matrices they are zero.
I have following problem: I want to count data in one table, count data
I have following problem: I have to make a ASP.NET Webapplication with a two-row
I have following problem: I have built a tabbar application with 4 tabs. I
I have following problem, Code: String a=Yeahh, I have no a idea what's happening
Hi i have following Problem. I write a Mediawiki Extension where i need some
I am using GWT/JAVA for development. I have following problem: I want to remove
I have the following problem. I have embedded a map using Google Maps' API.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.