Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8697839
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 13, 20262026-06-13T01:36:53+00:00 2026-06-13T01:36:53+00:00

I have found that many javascript developers create methods that simply return a property

  • 0

I have found that many javascript developers create methods that simply return a property like this :

function Obj (prop) {
    this.prop = prop; // public
}
Obj.prototype.getProp = function () {
    return this.prop;
};

While prop is public and can be accessed like this :

var a = obj.prop;

Moreover, I found that accessing an object property with a method is 121 times slower than accessing it directly (in Firefox)

var a, b,
    obj = new Obj(1);

a = obj.prop;
// ~6ns on Chrome
// ~5ns on Firefox

b = obj.getProp();
// ~6ns on Chrome (no difference)
// ~730ns on Firefox (122x slower...)

So my question is: should we always create methods that return properties or can we access properties directly? Is that antipattern?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-13T01:36:54+00:00Added an answer on June 13, 2026 at 1:36 am

    Yes it’s an antipattern. Since js doesn’t have native getters and setters which will be crossbrowser, yet, you should create your own getters and setters like:

    Obj.prototype.getProp = function () {
        return this.prop;
    };
    

    Yes, you still can access this prop directly, but now you doesn’t have to. More on that. This way you can create private properties via closures:

    function Foo() {
       var __yourPrivateProp = 'Bar';
       return {
               getyourPrivateProp: function () {
                   return: __yourPrivateProp
               }
       };
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have refereed old questions and found that people face many issues after installing
I am relatively new to assembly language. I have found so many tutorials that
I have found that I have no problem using require to load something like
I know that this question might have been asked like 100 times, but, believe
Wondering how to open many new windows with Javascript. I have found plenty of
I have found that the size of the compiled JavaScript grows faster than I
I have found that call stack helps in finding the line number of a
I have found that it is impossible to write ( file_put_contents or simple fwrite
I have found that how to determine what columns are primary key column of
I have found that I often have to implement some sort of a scheduler

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.