Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1084433
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T22:33:40+00:00 2026-05-16T22:33:40+00:00

I have found that Scala always has a natural explanation to anything. Always something

  • 0

I have found that Scala always has a “natural explanation” to anything. Always something like “ohh, but that’s just a function being called on this and that object with this and that parameter”. In a sense, nothing is really compiler-magic as we know it from other languages.

My question is on the <- operator as used in the following code:

for(i <- 0 to 10) println(i)

In this example I can see it being rewritten to something like:

0.to(10).foreach((i:Int)=>println(i))

but this doesn’t explain how the i got carried into the anonymous function inside the foreach function. At the point where you write i it is not an object, and not yet a declared variable. So what is it, and how is it being carried over to the inside of foreach?

My guess is that I finally discovered something which is in fact compiler magic

Thanks for your time.

To clarify, my question is: how does the <- operator work in the 1st line of code since i is not an object on which it can be called as a function.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 3 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T22:33:41+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 10:33 pm

    <- is a language-defined keyword symbol, as is => but in distinct contrast to -> (which is a defined symbol). Because it is part of the basic Scala grammar, it can be used to create bindings (for the i in your example) which is something that cannot be done by user-defined constructs.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have found that I have no problem using require to load something like
I have done various tests and I have found that the jQuery validate function
I have written a simple depth-first search in Scala with a recursive function like
What techniques that people have found useful using Clojure, Scala, JRuby, build tools, etc.
I have just found out this syntax for a scala Map (used here in
I have some code, say in Foo.scala that compiles readily with scalac , but
I'm still a noob in Scala development but I have found the Option[T] concept
I have found that call stack helps in finding the line number of a
I have found that it is impossible to write ( file_put_contents or simple fwrite
I have found that how to determine what columns are primary key column of

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.