Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8578623
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 11, 20262026-06-11T20:25:59+00:00 2026-06-11T20:25:59+00:00

I have found the following method in an open source project : static IEnumerable<T>

  • 0

I have found the following method in an open source project:

    static IEnumerable<T> Cat<T>(T t) {
        yield return t;
    }

As far as I understand, it does nothing else than returning an IEnumerable<T> containing t. If I am right and it’s virtual equivalent to e.g. return new List<T>{t};, what’s the purpose/advantage of using yield return here? And if I am wrong, what do I miss?

Full source can be found here.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-11T20:26:00+00:00Added an answer on June 11, 2026 at 8:26 pm

    This just makes an enumerable type that contains a single element (t). In practical terms, you are correct – it’s effectively going to be very similar to just returning a new List<T> with one element, or a new array with one element, etc.

    The main difference is that the returned type won’t actually be a List<T> or an array – it’ll be a compiler generated type. You wouldn’t be able to cast the result to a list and add elements, for example. In practical purposes, it’ll behave identically to returning a new List<T> as you described.

    There is likely no real advantage, other than the developer probably preferred this syntax. I suspect was probably used to allow single elements to work with other portions of the API which expect an IEnumerable<T> to be passed in, though the method name leaves a bit to be desired, IMO.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Hello this is may first question and I have found so far the following
On the MSDN, I have found following: public event EventHandler<MyEventArgs> SampleEvent; public void DemoEvent(string
I have found the following fragment in the Linux kernel (not the corresponding C
I have found the following command in AWK useful in Vim :'<,'>!awk '{ print
I have found the following expression which is intended to modify the id of
I have found the following resources on Balanced Matching for .net Regexes: http://weblogs.asp.net/whaggard/archive/2005/02/20/377025.aspx http://blogs.msdn.com/bclteam/archive/2005/03/15/396452.aspx
Reading a book I have found the following statement: (Object) Behaviors answer either of
Searching online, I have found the following routine for calculating the sign of a
FINAL EDIT: After following the answer from Darin Dimitrov, I have found that the
I have the following function: def storeTaggedCorpus(corpus, filename): corpusFile = codecs.open(filename, mode = 'w',

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.