Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9103295
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 17, 20262026-06-17T01:36:08+00:00 2026-06-17T01:36:08+00:00

I have generic classes that look like: interface X<Input, Output> { Output process(Input input);

  • 0

I have generic classes that look like:

interface X<Input, Output>
{
  Output process(Input input);
}

class Y implements X<Integer, Float> 
{   
  Float process(Integer input); 
}

I use getDeclaredMethods to find process on Y just with its name (not the arguments, on purpose). When I look at the return Method[], process shows up twice, with Input=Object, Output=Object, and then with the actual instantiation types: Integer and Float.

Please note: I can see 1 function with Object,Object in the Method[] AND 1 function with the actual types I use to instantiate, like Integer,Float. So, the second function, which I’m interested in, is accessible from Method[].

What is the best way to get only the method with the actual types?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-17T01:36:10+00:00Added an answer on June 17, 2026 at 1:36 am

    and then with the actual instantiation types.

    That’s not possible. You should see a single method whose parameter types are Object. You can also look at the method’s generic parameter and return types, and you will find that they are both type variables (Input and Output are type variables).

    Subclasses of this class that inherit from it with specific type arguments for the type parameters, will have two methods: a method with the more specific parameter and return types, and a bridge method, with the original class’s method’s parameter and return types, in order to override it. If you are asking how to ignore the bridge method, simply check if it’s a bridge method (.isBridge())

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a system.collections.generic.list(of ListBox) I would like to use the collection classes built-in
I have generic type that looks like: public class GenericClass<T, U> where T :
I have a pair of classes that look something like this. There's a Generator
I'm having trouble grasping generic methods. I have two classes that are generated (they
I have a base class with many sub-classes, and a generic function to cache
Why can't open generic types be passed as parameters. I frequently have classes like:
I have a generic interface, IValidator. I want to be able to use StructureMap
I have a number of LINQ classes that inherit from the same base class.
I have the following generic classes: class Base<T> where T : ... { ...
I have read around that serializing generic classes is not supported out of the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.