Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4007304
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T08:37:00+00:00 2026-05-20T08:37:00+00:00

I have had a scan performed on my website looking for vulnerabilities, etc. The

  • 0

I have had a scan performed on my website looking for vulnerabilities, etc. The report was returned saying there was a risk of an XSS attack, I have looked in to my website code and the only issue I can find (which is causing a W3C validation error) is that I have accidentally added ‘language=”javascript”‘ to my script tag…could this have thrown the error which they have reported? I don’t have any form inputs and it is not connected to a database.

Many thanks, in advance.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T08:37:01+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 8:37 am

    Any reputable consultant should make it clear in their report exactly what the risk is and how it is reproduced. I’d expect to see documented methodology, findings and conclusions.

    If they can’t demonstrate a risk then they can’t say they have found one.

    UPDATE:

    Based on your comment I’ve found the following, which identifies this as a general vulnerability with the Apache webserver rather than your particular code. You should ask whoever manages your webhosting to comment.

    A flaw in the handling of invalid Expect headers. If an attacker can influence the Expect header that a victim sends to a target site they could perform a cross-site scripting attack. It is known that some versions of Flash can set an arbitrary Expect header which can trigger this flaw. Not marked as a security issue for 2.0 or 2.2 as the cross-site scripting is only returned to the victim after the server times out a connection.

    • see:
      http://www.rapid7.com/vulndb/lookup/http-apache-expect-header-xss
    • also:
      http://www.iss.net/security_center/reference/vuln/HTTP_Apache_Expect_XSS.htm

    UPDATE 2:

    The following is a description of the vulnerability (link). Ask your hosting people to check their servers are properly patched.

    In May 2006 a reporter found a bug in Apache where an invalid Expect header sent
    to the server (Apache 1.3.3 onwards) would be returned to the user in an error
    message, unescaped. This could allow a cross-site scripting attack only if a
    victim can tricked into connecting to a site and sending such a carefully
    crafted Expect header. Whist browsers do not provide this functionality, it was
    recently discovered that Flash allows you to make a connection with arbitrary
    headers. The attack mechanism is therefore:

    1. User is tricked into visiting a malicious web site with a flash-enabled browser
    2. Malicious web site uses a flash movie to make a connection to the target site
      with custom Expect header
    3. This results in cross-site scripting (attacker could steal your cookies from
      the third party site, or inject content etc)
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

We have had a PCI scan on one of our websites passed on to
I have had a quick scan of the Guava API and the new collection
Have had to write my first proper multithreaded coded recently, and realised just how
We have had SharePoint where I work for a little while now, but we've
I have had to do this several times, usually when trying to find in
I have had a bug recently that only manifested itself when the library was
We have had issues with Mootools not being very backward compatible specifically in the
I have had a few problems with log files growing too big on my
We have/had a phantom delay in our app. This was traced to the initialisation
I have had many requests come in to a project that I work on,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.