Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6906459
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T08:18:46+00:00 2026-05-27T08:18:46+00:00

I have implemented a recursive algorithm, to improve the performance I want to add

  • 0

I have implemented a recursive algorithm, to improve the performance I want to add a memoization table. The most natural structure for my problem would be

map<pair<int,int>,int> lookup_table;

and the recursive algorithm that I use is

int max_sum_path(int maximum_rows,vector<vector<int> >& matrix,int row_index,int colm_index)
{
  if(row_index >= maximum_rows || colm_index > row_index)
  {
    //we have reached a cell outside the Triangular Matrix
    return 0;
  }
  else if(lookup_table.find(row_index,colm_index) != lookup_table.end())
  {
    //the memoization step to avoid repeated calculations and make recursion more efficient
    return lookup_table[row_index,colm_index];
  }
  else
  {
    lookup_table[row_index,colm_index] = matrix[row_index][colm_index] + max(max_sum_path(maximum_rows,matrix,row_index+1,colm_index), max_sum_path(maximum_rows,matrix,row_index+1,colm_index+1));
    return lookup_table[row_index,colm_index];
  }
}

This throws a tonne of compiler errors. I’m not sure if the syntax is correct.
Should I be using a string buffer to create a string and then use it instead of the pair?

Here are the compiler errors:

sums_triangle.cpp: In function ‘int max_sum_path(int, std::vector<std::vector<int> >&, int, int)’:
sums_triangle.cpp:50:49: error: no matching function for call to ‘std::map<std::pair<int, int>, int>::find(int&, int&)’
sums_triangle.cpp:50:49: note: candidates are:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/bits/stl_map.h:736:7: note: std::map<_Key, _Tp, _Compare, _Alloc>::iterator std::map<_Key, _Tp, _Compare, _Alloc>::find(const key_type&) [with _Key = std::pair<int, int>, _Tp = int, _Compare = std::less<std::pair<int, int> >, _Alloc = std::allocator<std::pair<const std::pair<int, int>, int> >, std::map<_Key, _Tp, _Compare, _Alloc>::iterator = std::_Rb_tree_iterator<std::pair<const std::pair<int, int>, int> >, std::map<_Key, _Tp, _Compare, _Alloc>::key_type = std::pair<int, int>]
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/bits/stl_map.h:736:7: note:   candidate expects 1 argument, 2 provided
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/bits/stl_map.h:751:7: note: std::map<_Key, _Tp, _Compare, _Alloc>::const_iterator std::map<_Key, _Tp, _Compare, _Alloc>::find(const key_type&) const [with _Key = std::pair<int, int>, _Tp = int, _Compare = std::less<std::pair<int, int> >, _Alloc = std::allocator<std::pair<const std::pair<int, int>, int> >, std::map<_Key, _Tp, _Compare, _Alloc>::const_iterator = std::_Rb_tree_const_iterator<std::pair<const std::pair<int, int>, int> >, std::map<_Key, _Tp, _Compare, _Alloc>::key_type = std::pair<int, int>]
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/bits/stl_map.h:751:7: note:   candidate expects 1 argument, 2 provided
sums_triangle.cpp:53:35: warning: left operand of comma operator has no effect [-Wunused-value]
sums_triangle.cpp:53:45: error: no match for ‘operator[]’ in ‘lookup_table[(0, colm_index)]’
sums_triangle.cpp:53:45: note: candidate is:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/bits/stl_map.h:445:7: note: std::map<_Key, _Tp, _Compare, _Alloc>::mapped_type& std::map<_Key, _Tp, _Compare, _Alloc>::operator[](const key_type&) [with _Key = std::pair<int, int>, _Tp = int, _Compare = std::less<std::pair<int, int> >, _Alloc = std::allocator<std::pair<const std::pair<int, int>, int> >, std::map<_Key, _Tp, _Compare, _Alloc>::mapped_type = int, std::map<_Key, _Tp, _Compare, _Alloc>::key_type = std::pair<int, int>]
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/bits/stl_map.h:445:7: note:   no known conversion for argument 1 from ‘int’ to ‘const key_type& {aka const std::pair<int, int>&}’
sums_triangle.cpp:57:28: warning: left operand of comma operator has no effect [-Wunused-value]
sums_triangle.cpp:57:38: error: no match for ‘operator[]’ in ‘lookup_table[(0, colm_index)]’
sums_triangle.cpp:57:38: note: candidate is:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/bits/stl_map.h:445:7: note: std::map<_Key, _Tp, _Compare, _Alloc>::mapped_type& std::map<_Key, _Tp, _Compare, _Alloc>::operator[](const key_type&) [with _Key = std::pair<int, int>, _Tp = int, _Compare = std::less<std::pair<int, int> >, _Alloc = std::allocator<std::pair<const std::pair<int, int>, int> >, std::map<_Key, _Tp, _Compare, _Alloc>::mapped_type = int, std::map<_Key, _Tp, _Compare, _Alloc>::key_type = std::pair<int, int>]
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/bits/stl_map.h:445:7: note:   no known conversion for argument 1 from ‘int’ to ‘const key_type& {aka const std::pair<int, int>&}’
sums_triangle.cpp:58:35: warning: left operand of comma operator has no effect [-Wunused-value]
sums_triangle.cpp:58:45: error: no match for ‘operator[]’ in ‘lookup_table[(0, colm_index)]’
sums_triangle.cpp:58:45: note: candidate is:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/bits/stl_map.h:445:7: note: std::map<_Key, _Tp, _Compare, _Alloc>::mapped_type& std::map<_Key, _Tp, _Compare, _Alloc>::operator[](const key_type&) [with _Key = std::pair<int, int>, _Tp = int, _Compare = std::less<std::pair<int, int> >, _Alloc = std::allocator<std::pair<const std::pair<int, int>, int> >, std::map<_Key, _Tp, _Compare, _Alloc>::mapped_type = int, std::map<_Key, _Tp, _Compare, _Alloc>::key_type = std::pair<int, int>]
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.6.2/../../../../include/c++/4.6.2/bits/stl_map.h:445:7: note:   no known conversion for argument 1 from ‘int’ to ‘const key_type& {aka const std::pair<int, int>&}’
sums_triangle.cpp:60:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type]

Just to be clear, I’m not sure if the syntax is correct. I want to know how I can use a pair as the key for a map.

Extra Info:
I had asked this question earlier. I’m optimizing it now. Feel free to suggest a different structure for the memoization table.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T08:18:47+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 8:18 am

    Instead of this,

    lookup_table.find(row_index,colm_index) //incorrect - your code
    

    write this,

    lookup_table.find(std::make_pair(row_index,colm_index)) //correct - my code
    

    Similarly see these as well,

    lookup_table[row_index,colm_index];  //incorrect  - your code
    lookup_table[std::make_pair(row_index,colm_index)]; //correct - my code
    

    Explanation:

    Since lookup_table is std::map<std::pair<int,int>,int>, its key type is std::pair<int,int>, so the index to lookup_table has to be its key, when you use [] operator.

    std::make_pair is a utility function which returns an object of type std::pair<int,int> if both arguments to std::make_pair are int. Instead of writing, std::make_pair, you can use std::pair<int,int>(row_index,colm_index) but this looks cumbersome, that is why std::make_pair is preferred.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a tail recursive pathfinding algorithm that I've implemented in JavaScript and would
I have implemented a linked list as a self-referencing database table: CREATE TABLE LinkedList(
I have to implement this algorithm in Mathematica: My problem is that I don't
Command-line sftp in my Ubuntu doesn't have recursive put implemented. I found some debate
I have implemented what I thought was a pretty decent representation of MVC in
I have implemented a simple file upload-download mechanism. When a user clicks a file
I have implemented a python webserver. Each http request spawns a new thread. I
I have implemented a SAX parser in Java by extending the default handler. The
I have implemented VirtualPathProvider class so I can keep all my views in the
I have implemented tracing based on System.Diagnostics. I am also using a System.Diagnostics.TextWriterTraceListener, and

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.