Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6008799
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T01:52:34+00:00 2026-05-23T01:52:34+00:00

I have implemented the regula falsi method. I am trying to modify it so

  • 0

I have implemented the regula falsi method. I am trying to modify it so it becomes the secant method. A pdf I read mentioned that it is essentially the same with just one change.
Future guesses for my ‘m’ value should have a slightly different formula, instead of:

m = a - f(a) * ( (b-a)/( f(b)-f(a) ) );

it should be:

m = a - f(a) * ( (m-a)/( f(m)-f(a) ) );

but unfortunately it doesn’t work (It never finds the root). What should I fix to get this into the secant method?

source code as follows:

#include <stdio.h>
#include <math.h>


void
secant(double a, double b, double e, double (*f)(double), int maxiter ) {
  double m, fm, fa, fb;
  int i;

  fa=(*f)(a);
  fb=(*f)(b);

  m = a - fa * ( (b-a)/( fb - fa ) );

  fm=(*f)(m);


   for(i=0; i<maxiter; i++) {
    if ( fabs(fm) <= e ) {                               
      printf("f(%f) = %f\n", m, fm);
      return;
    } else if ((fa*fm) < 0) {
      b=m;
      fb=fm;
    } else {
      a=m;
      fa=fm;
    }

     // the guess below works for regula falsi method:   
     // m = a - fa * ( (b-a)/(fb - fa)); 

     //this was supposed to be the change to turn this into the secant method 
     m = a - fa * ( (m-a)/(fm - fa) ); 

     fm=(*f)(m);
  }
}

int main(){
secant(1,4,0.0001,sin,500);
return 0;
}

Thanks in advance

EDIT: Ok after playing around with pen and paper I finally got it it wasnt a simple change as I initially thought:

void secant(double a, double b, double e, double (*f)(double), int maxiter ) {
  double m, fm, fa, fb;
  int i;
  fa=(*f)(a);
  fb=(*f)(b);

   for(i=0; i<maxiter; i++) {
     m = a - fa * ( (b-a)/(fb - fa) );
     fm=(*f)(m);
     if ( fabs(fm) <= e ) {                               
        printf("f(%f)=%f, iter: %d\n", m,fm,i);
         return;
     }
     a=b;
     b=m;
     fa=fb;
     fb=fm;
  }
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T01:52:34+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 1:52 am

    It’s easier for the secant method to not find the root. Are you sure it should find it?

    For testing, here is an example: http://www.mathcs.emory.edu/ccs/ccs315/ccs315/node18.html
    (example 4.7) You’d want to run that example ( f(x)=x^6-x-1 , x0=1 x1=2, root x=1.347)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have implemented a test method with Jersey to run on my Google AppEngine
I have implemented Facebook into my app but now I find that whenever I
I have implemented a UISearchDisplayController that allows users to search a table. Currently the
I have implemented a simple entity ejb with a @version annotation. I expect that
I have implemented a simple little DSL that generates classes from input files, by
I have implemented correctly bump's api, and added this code: - (void) configureBump {
I have implemented pagination to my data, but the problem is I only have
I have implemented a table view with multiple threads. Currently when a user taps
I have implemented clean URLs using the following in my .htaccess RewriteEngine on RewriteCond
I have implemented a very basic sign up using email address+name, although I would

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.