Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3221880
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T15:55:38+00:00 2026-05-17T15:55:38+00:00

I have implemented this function: static <X,Y> Y castOrNull(X obj) { try { return

  • 0

I have implemented this function:

 static <X,Y> Y castOrNull(X obj) {
  try {
   return (Y)obj;
  }
  catch(ClassCastException e) {
   return null;
  }
 }

This gives me the compiler warning:

Type safety: Unchecked cast from X to Y

Which I don’t exactly understand. Isn’t the try/catch which I am doing here a check for it? Can I ignore the warning?

Will my function work as expected or not? How would I implement it correctly?

I also tried with a obj instanceof Y check but that doesn’t work because of the way Java handle generics.

Btw., this function seems quite useful to me (to make some other code more clean). I wonder if such a function may already exist in Java?


One example where I want to use it:

    void removeEmptyRawStrings() {
        for(Iterator<Entity> e = entities.iterator(); e.hasNext();) {
            RawString s = castOrNull(e.next());
            if(s != null && s.content.isEmpty()) e.remove();
        }
    }

I have cases like these quite often in my code. And I think this is more readable and simpler than anything else. But please give me a better suggestion if you have any about how to make that code even more simple.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T15:55:38+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 3:55 pm

    So the problem here is that the generic parameter Y when used for dynamic casting is treated as Object. It will never throw a CCE. You get a CCE thrown in the calling method, as you have broken static type safety.

    Also X is entirely pointless here:

    Almost certainly the correct solution is not to attempt anything like this. null is bad. Casting is bad.

    However, if you are determined to write nonsense, you can pass the Class object:

    public static <T> T evilMethod(Class<T> clazz, Object obj) {
        try {
            return clazz.cast(obj);
        } catch (ClassCastException exc) {
            return null;
        }
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I just finished reading this post: https://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html#flush and have already implemented a flush after
I have this question: Does implementing a custom MembershipProvider class needs you to implement
This probably sounds really stupid but I have noo idea how to implement jquery's
I have a custom class that implements that IComparable. This class is stored in
I have a custom class that implements ICollection , and this class is readonly,
Let's say I have a class that implements the IDisposable interface. Something like this:
Actually, this question seems to have two parts: How to implement pattern matching? How
I have implemented what I thought was a pretty decent representation of MVC in
I have implemented a simple file upload-download mechanism. When a user clicks a file
I have implemented a python webserver. Each http request spawns a new thread. I

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.