Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6136239
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T17:34:45+00:00 2026-05-23T17:34:45+00:00

I have index on a column, let’s say ID (bigint). If I have a

  • 0

I have index on a column, let’s say ID (bigint). If I have a query with something like this:

SELECT * 
  FROM table 
 WHERE id = 12345

…it will use index. But when I’m using query like…

SELECT * 
  FROM table 
 WHERE id >= 12345 
   AND id <= 12366

It use sequential scan, which is very slow. Can I force using the ID index?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T17:34:45+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 5:34 pm

    It should use the index if the index type is btree and select doesn’t fetch more then 30% of all record count (is it true in postgresql as well?) @scott-marlowe says that “..for PostgreSQL the switchover point comes much earlier, somewhere in the 1 to 10% range where it’s cheaper to do a sequential scan..”.

    Try calling REINDEX action maybe?

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Let's say I have a table like this: CREATE TABLE t( [guid] [uniqueidentifier] NOT
If I have a table column with data and create an index on this
I have a table like this with a computed column: CREATE TABLE PhoneNumbers (
Let's say I have a file like this (pretend it were a matrix): abcde
I have a table which looks like this: Column | Type | ----------------------+-------------------------+ ...
I have a composite index on three column in one of my table. It
I have a table, let's call it Users . This table has primary key
Let's say we have a table with columns DAY and NUMERO. There can be
Let say we have a table with 6 million records. There are 16 integer
Let's say I have a table with 15 columns called MyTable and an UPDATE

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.