Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6590617
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T17:19:20+00:00 2026-05-25T17:19:20+00:00

I have inherited a poorly designed Access 2002 database. I am trying to troubleshoot

  • 0

I have inherited a poorly designed Access 2002 database. I am trying to troubleshoot a few queries, and one query in particular has left me scratching my head. It is nesting several joins to the same table… each join is nested in the previous join rather than just joining to the same table multiple times. I honestly can’t even say for sure why this query works – I have never seen a join created this way… Can anyone comment on the effect of these inner joins (performance wise?) and will I see a performance improvement by un-nesting them?

Example:

--Detals cut
FROM tempMapIDs INNER JOIN 
(BenefitMapRiders AS RxDeduct INNER JOIN 
(BenefitMapRiders AS SubAbuse INNER JOIN 
(BenefitMapRiders AS Infertility INNER JOIN 
(BenefitMapRiders AS Dental INNER JOIN 
(BenefitMapRiders AS Chiro INNER JOIN 
(BenefitMapRiders AS Vision INNER JOIN 
(BenefitMapRiders AS Drug INNER JOIN qryOptionsMap ON Drug.NewRiderOption = qryOptionsMap.Drug) 
ON Vision.NewRiderOption = qryOptionsMap.Vision) 
ON Chiro.NewRiderOption = qryOptionsMap.Chiro) 
ON Dental.NewRiderOption = qryOptionsMap.Dental) 
ON Infertility.NewRiderOption = qryOptionsMap.Infertility) 
ON SubAbuse.NewRiderOption = qryOptionsMap.SubAbuse) 
ON RxDeduct.NewRiderOption = qryOptionsMap.RxDeduct) 

ON (tempMapIDs.NewDate = qryOptionsMap.RenewalDate) 
    AND (tempMapIDs.NewPlanOption = qryOptionsMap.PlanOption) 
    AND (tempMapIDs.RxDeduct = RxDeduct.OldRiderOption) 
    AND (tempMapIDs.SubAbuse = SubAbuse.OldRiderOption) 
    AND (tempMapIDs.Infertility = Infertility.OldRiderOption) 
    AND (tempMapIDs.Chiro = Chiro.OldRiderOption) 
    AND (tempMapIDs.Vision = Vision.OldRiderOption) 
    AND (tempMapIDs.Dental = Dental.OldRiderOption) 
    AND (tempMapIDs.Drug = Drug.OldRiderOption) 
    AND (tempMapIDs.MapID = RxDeduct.MapID) 
    AND (tempMapIDs.MapID = SubAbuse.MapID) 
    AND (tempMapIDs.MapID = Infertility.MapID) 
    AND (tempMapIDs.MapID = Chiro.MapID) 
    AND (tempMapIDs.MapID = Vision.MapID) 
    AND (tempMapIDs.MapID = Dental.MapID) 
    AND (tempMapIDs.MapID = Drug.MapID)
) 
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T17:19:21+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 5:19 pm

    That is just the way Access tends to write queries when you use the visual query designer to create them. It shouldn’t perform any worse than the equivalent syntax you are used to.

    Create a new query with 2 or three joins using the visual designer and you will see the same syntax.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have inherited a Access database that has a query that SELECTs over 50
I have inherited a database that has a table (300gb) full of SQL datatype
I have inherited a VC++ solution and from one project (named IntersonWinDriver) I'm trying
I have inherited a really bad access database that I need to move the
Our database is poorly designed all the way around (we inherited it). I've reworked
I have inherited a medium sized database that we are trying to use with
I have inherited a poorly written web application that seems to have errors when
I have inherited a VB6/Access application that we have developed and sold for many
I have inherited a load of VB6 code which has tons of individual OCX
I have inherited some code that queries a DB over a WCF service and

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.