I have just written a small piece of code and it struck me that I am not sure what method of initialisation is best practice when it comes to initialising my member variables which will be exposed and used via properties. Which is the best way to initialise my member variables out of the two examples below and more importantly why?
Example 1:
private string m_connectionString = ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings["ApplicationDefault"].ConnectionString;
private string m_providerName = ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings["ApplicationDefault"].ProviderName;
public string ConnectionString
{
get { return m_connectionString; }
set { m_connectionString = value; }
}
public string ProviderName
{
get { return m_providerName; }
set { m_providerName = value; }
}
public EntityClusterRefreshServiceDatabaseWorker()
{
}
Example 2:
private string m_connectionString;
private string m_providerName;
public string ConnectionString
{
get { return m_connectionString; }
set { m_connectionString = value; }
}
public string ProviderName
{
get { return m_providerName; }
set { m_providerName = value; }
}
public EntityClusterRefreshServiceDatabaseWorker()
{
ConnectionString = ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings["ApplicationDefault"].ConnectionString;
ProviderName = ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings["ApplicationDefault"].ProviderName;
}
NOTE: Assume that I am not using these variables in a static context.
It really doesn’t matter which of those you use, except in the very odd situation where a base class constructor calls an overridden member, in which case the timing would change: instance variable initializers are run before the base class constructor call, whereas obviously the constructor body is executed afterwards.
In the latter case, you can make your code a lot simpler though using automatically implemented properties:
You can’t do this with the first form, as automatically implemented properties don’t have any way of specifying an initial value.
(You may also want to consider making the setters private, but that’s a separate concern.)