Home/ Questions/Q 60175
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-10T18:07:15+00:00

I have looked over the Repository pattern and I recognized some ideas that I

  • 0

I have looked over the Repository pattern and I recognized some ideas that I was using in the past which made me feel well.

However now I would like to write an application that would use this pattern BUT I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE THE ENTITY CLASSES DECOUPLED from the repository provider.

I would create several assemblies :

  1. an ‘Interfaces’ assembly which would host common interfaces including the IRepository interface
  2. an ‘Entities’ assembly which would host the entity classes such as Product, User, Order and so on. This assembly would be referenced by the ‘Interfaces’ assembly since some methods would return such types or arrays of them. Also it would be referenced by the main application assembly (such as the Web Application)
  3. one or more Repository provider assembly/assemblies. Each would include (at least) a class that implements the IRepository interface and it would work with a certain Data Store. Data stores could include an SQL Server, an Oracle server, MySQL, XML files, Web / WCF services and so on.

Studying LINQ to SQL which looks very productive in terms of time taken to implement all seems well until I discover the deep dependency between the generated classes and the CustomDataContext class.

How can I use LINQ to SQL in such a scenario?

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. I don’t know if this is exactly what you want, but you may want to take a look at Rob Conery’s MVC Storefront code. He uses a variant of the repository pattern with a linq provider. He maps the LINQ to Sql objects to domain objects and then returns the domain objects from the repository provider to a service layer which wraps the provider allowing him to work some logic on the data returned before it hits the business layer.

    MVC Storefront Webcasts
    Code

    To me it sounds like you want the providers to return DTOs and then you want to map the DTOs to the domain objects in the repository/service layer. If this is the case you could map your LINQ to SQL provider to the DTOs, have it return them, then map the DTOs to domain objects in the repository/service layer. This should work just fine, but it may become tedious as you now would have 2 mapping layers.

    In this case you would have: ProductService, which takes an IProductRepository. It evokes methods on the IProductRepository to get back your DTOs. It then maps the DTOs to the real business objects and returns them to the calling code.

    • 0