Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3935522
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 19, 20262026-05-19T23:50:22+00:00 2026-05-19T23:50:22+00:00

I have many standalone scripts. The only thing they share, is that they use()

  • 0

I have many standalone scripts. The only thing they share, is that they use() a large set of CPAN modules (that each export several functions). I would like to centralize this list of modules. I found several methods. Which one is the best?

  1. I could create SharedModules.pm that imports everything and then manually exports everything to main:: using Exporter.

  2. I could create SharedModules.pm that starts with “package main;” so it will import directly into main::. It seems to work. Is it bad practice and why?

  3. I could require() a sharedmodules.pl that seems to import everything into main:: as well. I don’t like this method as require() doesn’t work that well under mod_perl.

Number two looks best to me, however I wonder why for example Modern::Perl doesn’t work that way.

Edit: I figured this question has been asked before.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-19T23:50:22+00:00Added an answer on May 19, 2026 at 11:50 pm

    The problem with all three of your proposed solutions is that the module may be used from another module, in which case the symbols should be exported into the useing module’s package, not into main.

    bvr’s solution of using caller to import things directly into that package is a major step in the right direction, but prevents the ‘real’ package from using use ShareableModules qw( foo bar baz); to selectively import only what it actually needs.

    Unfortunately, preserving the ability to import selectively will require you to import all relevant symbols from the underlying modules and then re-export them from ShareableModules. You can’t just delegate the import to each underlying module’s import method (as Modern::Perl does) because import dies if it’s asked for a symbol that isn’t exported by that module. If that’s not an issue, though, then Modern::Perl‘s way of doing it is probably the cleanest and simplest option.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

We have many projects that use a common base of shared components (dlls). Currently
I have many sites that use the same root category of the Main Site.
I have many structs (classes) and standalone functions that I like to compile separately
I have many items inside a list control. I want each item to have
I have many emails coming in from different sources. they all have attachments, many
I have many jobs that have a step to send 1 specific email out
I have many requires and includes and i was wondering if there's something that
I have an unusual environment in a project where I have many files that
I have a simple xml file that looks like this: <?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8 standalone=yes
I have many, (15-20) different XML files that I need to load to VB.Net.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.