Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7582947
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 30, 20262026-05-30T18:33:43+00:00 2026-05-30T18:33:43+00:00

I have method that does asynchronous call to web service. Something like that: public

  • 0

I have method that does asynchronous call to web service. Something like that:

public static async Task<ReturnResultClass> GetBasicResponseAsync()
{
    var r = await SomeClass.StartAsyncOp();
    return await OtherClass.ProcessAsync(r);
}

And I want to provide synchronous alternative:

public static ReturnResultClass GetBasicResponse()
{
    return GetBasicResponseAsync().Result;
}

But it blocks on Result call. Because it is called on the same thread as a async operations. How can I get result synchronously ?

Thanks!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-30T18:33:44+00:00Added an answer on May 30, 2026 at 6:33 pm

    You’re right, if you’re in a GUI application, the continuation part(s) of an async method will execute on the UI thread by default. And if you execute synchronous wait for the same Task on the UI thread at the same time, you will get a deadlock.

    If it’s your application, you can solve this by simply not waiting for the task synchronously.

    If you’re just writing a library, you can fix this by using ConfigureAwait(false). This way, the continuation part of the method will not execute on the captured context (the UI thread in GUI applications), but instead on a ThreadPool thread.

    public static async Task<ReturnResultClass> GetBasicResponseAsync()
    {
        var r = await SomeClass.StartAsyncOp().ConfigureAwait(false);
        return await OtherClass.ProcessAsync(r).ConfigureAwait(false);
    }
    

    Of course, the ideal solution is to not use synchronous operations in your GUI apps and use ConfigureAwait() in your library, so that others can use synchronous versions of the methods, if they want.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a web service (ASMX) and in it, a web method that does
I have an ASP.NET web service which does some heavy lifting, like say,some file
In Python compiled regex patterns have a findall method that does the following: Return
Is there a method of accessing an Exchange server that does not have IMAP
I know that an interface does not have a body, just a method definition.
Let's say I have a class that implements the IDisposable interface. Something like this:
For example, we call BeginReceive and have the callback method that BeginReceive executes when
I know how to make Async methods but say I have a method that
We are testing a new kind of advertising method that does call scripts asynchronously
When I'm debugging, I often have to deal with methods that does not use

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.