Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 273923
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T00:31:51+00:00 2026-05-12T00:31:51+00:00

I have mutliple workers SELECTing and UPDATing row. id status 10 new 11 new

  • 0

I have mutliple workers SELECTing and UPDATing row.

id status
10 new
11 new
12 old
13 old

Worker selects a ‘new’ row and updates its status to ‘old’.
What if two workers select same row at the same time?
I mean worker1 selects a new row, and before worker one updates its status, worker2 selects the same row?

Should I SELECT and UPDATE in one query or is there another way?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 1 View
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T00:31:52+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 12:31 am

    You could LOCK the table before your read, and unlock it after your write. This would eliminate the chance of two workers updating the same record at the same time.

    http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/lock-tables.html

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there a way to have multiple delayed_job workers updating to the same table?
Do I need to have separate/multiple workers to run multiple websites (each with a
So I have a quartz installation using JDBCJobStore that has multiple tomcat workers. Is
If I have mutliple, and at the same time, Ajax javascript queries on domain/somefile.php,
I have a worker class that does stuff with a collection of objects. I
I have been working on implementing a (1) server, (n) worker role servers setup
I have a VB.net project which uses a background worker to do some stuff.
I have a two files in python, proc1.py and proc2.py, Both are implementation of
We have an ASP.net (2.0) application configured to run with multiple worker processes using
I have a question, regarding how the select text box is supposed to perform

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.