Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6375785
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T01:39:39+00:00 2026-05-25T01:39:39+00:00

I have not programmed in c++ in a long time and want some simple

  • 0

I have not programmed in c++ in a long time and want some simple behavior that no amount of virtual keywords has yet to produce:

class Base {
  public:
    int both() { return a(); }
};

class Derived : public Base {
  protected:
    int a();
};

class Problem : public Derived {
};

Problem* p = new Problem();
p.both();

Which gives me a compile-time error. Is this sort of behavior possible with c++? Do I just need forward declaration? Virtual keywords on everything?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T01:39:39+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 1:39 am

    No. You will have to use a pure virtual a in base.

    class Base {
        virtual int a() = 0;
        int both() {
            return a();
        }
    };
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Its been a long time since I have programmed in C++, but I know
I have been using php from some time and I have noticed that it
I'm not a Notes programmer, however, for my sins, have been working on some
I programmed a CMS that has a log of who has recently logged into
I've a method test that does not have a clear assert expression. The returned
I'm not a C++ programmer and have difficulty understanding the explanations given on websites.
I have an issue and NO it is not homework, it's just a programmer
So I am obviously not a very good programmer. I have written this small
Not really a programming question, but relevant to many programmers... Let's say I have
have not tested on windows. but in ubuntu when u disconnect from the network,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.