Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8860677
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 14, 20262026-06-14T15:18:36+00:00 2026-06-14T15:18:36+00:00

I have noticed weird conflict between twitter bootstrap (2.2.1) and ad-gallery in Internet Explorer.

  • 0

I have noticed weird conflict between twitter bootstrap (2.2.1) and ad-gallery in Internet Explorer.

Turns out this lines in bootstrap.min.css causing a problem and images don’t show up:

img{max-width:100%;width:auto\9;height:auto;vertical-align:middle;border:0;-ms-interpolation-mode:bicubic;}

when i remove these two everything works normally:

width:auto\9;height:auto;

But instead of removing those i am trying to override those properties but none of this worked so far:

.ad-gallery img{width:default;height:default;}
.ad-gallery img{width:none;height:none;}
.ad-gallery img{width:auto;height:auto;}

How to override these properties ?

btw. there isn’t any problems with google chrome and mozilla firefox.
You can check the example with original bootstrap min css file from here, which is not working.

Here is the working example with modified bootstrap-modified.min.css from here.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-14T15:18:37+00:00Added an answer on June 14, 2026 at 3:18 pm

    As observed, the parent div (which has a class ad-image) of the img has the following in-line styles:

        left: 230px;
        top: 160px;
        width: 0px;
        height: 0px;
    

    This is actually the cause why your img also has the width and height of zero.

    Oh, I know you didn’t place those styles because it has a different value in Chrome (or in FF). So, where is the problem coming? Yeah, right, it is from the JavaScript.

    I checked the plugin that you used jquery.ad-gallery.js and made some debugging.

    I found out that the plugin is computing the dimension and position of the ad-image container using the dimension of the img. The dimension of the img is acquired using the dimension of the preloaded (cached) image.

    The problem with IE is that it’s returning back zero-value dimensions for the image causing its parent, which height and width are computed using it, to also have zero-value dimensions.

    Try to check if you can solve this JS issue. I believe that once this is solved, your issue will also be solved without additional CSS styles.

    As a work-around, add the following rule to your css:

        .ad-image {
            left: 0 !important;
            top: 0 !important;
            width: inherit !important;
            height: inherit !important;
        }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have noticed this weird behavior in firefox, it seems like font have some
I have noticed a number of kernel sources that look like this (found randomly
I have noticed in the PHP regex library there is a choice between ereg
I noticed Date.Parse can't handle only 2 digits dates. Say I have this mm/dd/yy
I have noticed some weird behaviour in Chrome 15 and Safari regarding jquery hover
In the last past days I noticed something weird optimizing my query. I have
We have noticed a weird error when calling ToLower() on certain strings. The input
I've taken over the development of a project and have noticed a weird snippet
Today i was debugging some lines of code and i noticed a very weird
I have noticed some weird behavior when sourcing another script within my shell script.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.