Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3401452
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T05:01:04+00:00 2026-05-18T05:01:04+00:00

I have one table [table] with two columns that needs to be filtered: [column1]

  • 0

I have one table [table] with two columns that needs to be filtered: [column1] and [column2].

In my program I execute a query like:

select * from [table] where [column1] = 'foo' and [column2] = 'bar';

Which is faster:

  1. Creating two indexes, one on each column. ([column1] and [column2])
  2. Creating one index containing both columns. ([column1]+[column2])

This question have been bugging me for a while, I have no idea how query optimization works and how SQL Server uses the created indexes to speed up queries.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T05:01:05+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 5:01 am

    Second one is ALWAYS faster for this query – but you need to put the more selective one first (in the order of indexes) to benefit more. The only exception is if for performance reasons, SQL decides to use clustered index so ignores the non-clustered.

    The combination of two values create a much more selective criteria. Also it helps with performance since there is no BOOKMARK LOOKUP required on a covering index.

    Bookmark lookups are the source of major performance degradation and that is why covering index is always better than 2 indexes.

    UPDATE

    Bear in mind, if you have your index as column1+coulmn2, searches on just column2 cannot use this index so you will need a separate index on column2 as well.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.