Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6069139
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T09:47:24+00:00 2026-05-23T09:47:24+00:00

I have quite a few of these: function addEventsAndStuff() { // bla bla }

  • 0

I have quite a few of these:

function addEventsAndStuff() {
  // bla bla
}
addEventsAndStuff();

function sendStuffToServer() {
  // send stuff
  // get HTML in response
  // replace DOM
  // add events:
  addEventsAndStuff();
}

Re-adding the events is necessary because the DOM has changed, so previously attached events are gone. Since they have to be attached initially as well (duh), they’re in a nice function to be DRY.

There’s nothing wrong with this set up (or is there?), but can I smooth it a little bit? I’d like to create the addEventsAndStuff() function and immediately call it, so it doesn’t look so amateuristic.

Both following respond with a syntax error:

function addEventsAndStuff() {
  alert('oele');
}();

(function addEventsAndStuff() {
  alert('oele');
})();

Any takers?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T09:47:25+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 9:47 am

    There’s nothing wrong with the example you posted in your question.. The other way of doing it may look odd, but:

    var addEventsAndStuff;
    (addEventsAndStuff = function(){
        // add events, and ... stuff
    })();
    

    There are two ways to define a function in JavaScript. A function declaration:

    function foo(){ ... }
    

    and a function expression, which is any way of defining a function other than the above:

    var foo = function(){};
    (function(){})();
    var foo = {bar : function(){}};
    

    …etc

    function expressions can be named, but their name is not propagated to the containing scope. Meaning this code is valid:

    (function foo(){
       foo(); // recursion for some reason
    }());
    

    but this isn’t:

    (function foo(){
        ...
    }());
    foo(); // foo does not exist
    

    So in order to name your function and immediately call it, you need to define a local variable, assign your function to it as an expression, then call it.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have seen quite a few ways to output variables. Which of these ways
I have quite a few libraries and models that get loaded into a controller,
I have quite a few situations where I have database structures similar to: TABLE
I have quite a few dictionaries where the key is a composite of several
I have quite a few problems, probably misunderstandings, about the new keyword with properties
In our code we have quite a few cases of this pattern: class outerClass
A question that seems to have quite a few options for Python, but none
I'm currently using QDataStream to serialize my classes. I have quite a few number
I have tried quite a few codes but none of them seem to work
I have written quite a few Ruby programs, but if I need to show

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.