Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4001002
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T07:51:04+00:00 2026-05-20T07:51:04+00:00

I have quite a few records in my program that I end up putting

  • 0

I have quite a few records in my program that I end up putting in a map using one of their fields as key. For example

(defrecord Foo. [id afield anotherfield])

And then I’d add that to a map with the id as key. This is all perfectly doable, but a bit tedious, e.g. when adding a new instance of Foo to a map I need to extract the key first. I’m wondering if somewhere in clojure.core a data structure to do this already exist?

Basically I’d like to construct a set of Foo’s by giving the set a value to key mapping function (i.e. :id) at construction time of the set, and then have that used when I want to add/find/remove/… a value.

So instead of:

(assoc my-map (:id a-foo) a-foo))

I could do, say:

(conj my-set a-foo)

And more interestingly, merge and merge-with support.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T07:51:05+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 7:51 am

    Sounds like a simple case where you would want to use a function to eliminate the “tedious” part.

    e.g.

    (defn my-assoc [some-map some-record]
      (assoc some-map (:id some-record) some-record))
    

    If you are doing this a lot and need different key functions, you might want to try a higher order function:

    (defn my-assoc-builder [id-function]
      (fn [some-map some-record] 
        (assoc some-map (id-function some-record) some-record)))
    
    (def my-assoc-by-id (my-assoc-builder :id))
    

    Finally, note that you could do the same with a macro. However a useful general rule with macros is not to use them unless you really need them. Thus in this case, since it can be done easily with a function, I’d recommend sticking to functions.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have quite a few dictionaries where the key is a composite of several
I have quite a few libraries and models that get loaded into a controller,
A question that seems to have quite a few options for Python, but none
I'm currently using QDataStream to serialize my classes. I have quite a few number
I have quite a few RewriteRules in my .htaccess that looks like this RewriteRule
I have quite a few situations where I have database structures similar to: TABLE
I have quite a few problems, probably misunderstandings, about the new keyword with properties
In our code we have quite a few cases of this pattern: class outerClass
I have tried quite a few codes but none of them seem to work
I have written quite a few Ruby programs, but if I need to show

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.