Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 879199
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T11:53:35+00:00 2026-05-15T11:53:35+00:00

I have read a counting sort algorithm which is like this: Counting Sort(A[1,..n]) //C[1,…k]

  • 0

I have read a counting sort algorithm which is like this:

Counting Sort(A[1,..n]) //C[1,...k] is the temporary memory and k is the range of integers
   for  i<-- 1 to k
      C[i]<-- 0
   for  j<-- 1 to n
      C[A[j]]<--C[A[j]]+1
   for  i<--2 to k
      C[i]<--C[i]+C[i-1]
   for  j<--n downto 1
      B[C[A[j]]]<--A[j]
      C[A[j]]<--C[A[j]]-1

I want to know that if I change the last for to this:for j<--1 to n ,the algorithm will be correct too???(is there any way to show that with this “for” the algorithm will be correct??? )

also in this way the algorithm is stable too?

thanks

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T11:53:36+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 11:53 am

    The algorithm is correct both ways. It is also stable as you have it right now.

    If you change the last for to what you said, it will stop being stable.

    Basically, C[i] = how many elements <= i exist after the end of the third for loop. So C[A[j]] gives you the the last position of an element with value A[j] in sorted order, C[A[j]] - 1 the second last position of an element with value A[j] and so on. This is why you decrement the values in C.

    Because of this, you have to start iterating your original array in reverse order if you care about stability: so that the last element with value x in your original array gets put first in the new array. Iterating your original array in reverse will guarantee that x is put after all other values equal to x, thus making the algorithm stable.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 439k
  • Answers 439k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I don't think there is a built in method for… May 15, 2026 at 4:50 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I solved it like this. There are probably other solutions… May 15, 2026 at 4:50 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I fixed it by creating two symbolic links /usr/lib/gcc ->… May 15, 2026 at 4:50 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.