Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6852291
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T01:21:12+00:00 2026-05-27T01:21:12+00:00

I have read (actually here on SO, but cannot find the post at the

  • 0

I have read (actually here on SO, but cannot find the post at the moment) about a way to hide elements with negative margins.

I recall, that the answer contained a deep explanation on why to do this, and the benefits over other methods (visibility: hidden; position: absolute;, display: none). And yes, the method provided a way to remove the element out of the document flow (possibly hackish, not valid).

Have I been dreaming about this or there is such a way? If there is, then yes, I would love the little in-depth explanation.

Thanks in advance!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T01:21:12+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 1:21 am

    Are you trying to hide block level elements like a div, or just the text on a link that’s got a background image, for instance. If it’s the second item, the CSS you’re looking for is text-indent. I’ve used it in the past like this:

    a.button {
      /* .button is a for instance class name */
      text-indent: -9999px
    }
    

    This will leave the block level element (the a tag) and any background you’ve placed on it, in the document flow, but will move the text off screen. This is a technique I’ve used in the past, but be careful of the text you’re hiding–the search engines look at this as a quasi-black hat technique. Just make sure the hidden text doesn’t look like keyword stuffing or obvious spam terms and you’ll be fine.

    Hope this helps.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have read this post about how to test private methods. I usually do
I have read other questions on this topic but none that actually answers my
I have read up on doing this, and actually implemented this, for v1.5 but
For instance, here is sample JPEG which I cannot SAVE (!) but can read
I have read about partial methods in the latest C# language specification , so
I have read the documentation for this element but still fail to understand what
I have read through several reviews on Amazon and some books seem outdated. I
I have read a lot that LISP can redefine syntax on the fly, presumably
I have read that using database keys in a URL is a bad thing
I have read on Stack Overflow some people that have converting to C#2.0 to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.