Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6944871
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T13:21:49+00:00 2026-05-27T13:21:49+00:00

I have read Gdk forum link which says that getting num lock state api

  • 0

I have read Gdk forum link which says that getting num lock state api is implemented since version 3.0. But I am using version 2.4 and I cannot update to version 3.0 as I need to support lower Linux version. Here is the discussion link:

http://mail.gnome.org/archives/commits-list/2010-July/msg00259.html

SO, is there any other way to get the num lock state using internal Linux command?

Regards,
iSight

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T13:21:50+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 1:21 pm

    I have checked the hard ware key code. Whenever num lock is on and pressed the number key at num pad i compare the hard ware key code which is universally constant to all manufacturer. Hence, I don’t need to use ioctl.h header.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have read http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~briangoetz/lambda/lambda-state-4.html and noticed that all the examples have argument type declared
I have read Answers to C++ interview questions among which there is one that
I have read a lot that LISP can redefine syntax on the fly, presumably
I have read that using database keys in a URL is a bad thing
I have read on Stack Overflow some people that have converting to C#2.0 to
I have read (or perhaps heard from a colleague) that in .NET, TransactionScope can
I have read in some of the ClickOnce posts that ClickOnce does not allow
I have read tutorials and several stack overflow posts that suggest I should use
i have read the thread Google Goggles API . and From NotAnotherCodeBlog have created
I have read that it is a good idea to give a 3D program

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.