Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
I have read in several places that single segment namespaces are discouraged in clojure.
Indeed almost every library I’ve seen has (require ‘lib.core) instead of (require ‘lib).
Why?
Edit: I am a bit stupid. Extra credit will be given for a concise example of how a single segment namespace might be a bad thing.
Java discourages the use of the default package because you can’t refer to anything in it from any other package. If you pre-compile a one-segment Clojure namespace, you’ll get a Java class in the default package. If anyone at any time wants to use your library from Java, he will be stopped dead by this triviality. As there is no good reason in favor of using a single-segment namespace, and there is this one well-defined reason not to, it is fair to say that single-segment namespaces should be a discouraged practice in Clojure.