Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6661883
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T02:19:53+00:00 2026-05-26T02:19:53+00:00

I have read several comments here that dBase is a dead system and no

  • 0

I have read several comments here that dBase is a dead system and no one use it anymore. I compared dBase and SQLite in php, and in my test dBase has many advantages over SQLite and similar systems:

  1. Its database file is much smaller
  2. Writing to the file is very faster with using a lesser amount of memory
  3. Growing the file size has a negligible effect on the query.

I admit that SQLite has a wider range of commands for a better flexibility; but what can be the reason of unreliability or incapability of dBase which sent it to the background?

I have no idea about concurrent connections (though SQLite has serious limitations too). Please comment on this issue.

Summary: Apart from functionality, I just wanted to know what is possible disadvantage of dBase in performance.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T02:19:54+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 2:19 am

    If you are working with a single table then you might not find much difference (aside from the lack of SQL command support in dBase), but as soon as you start using relational data and having multiple related tables, use of dBase falls apart. You have to glue all your relationships together in code with dBase where with SQLite you can have full foreign key support and have relational dependencies.

    Some might raise the objection that an InterBase server allows you to have relationships with dBase, but that is really outside the scope of what you’re saying.

    Summary: for single tables, maybe not much difference, for multiple, related tables, lots of of advantage to SQL-based systems like SQLite.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have read tutorials and several stack overflow posts that suggest I should use
I have read several articles on when to use nested classes, but none that
I've read several comments here and elsewhere suggesting that Erlang's process dictionary was a
I have read in several places that it's possible to share the objects directory
I'm quite confused about several books in .NET that I have read. Would someone
I have read several times that after you delete a row in an InnoDB
I have read several times that using catch (Exception ex) { Logger.LogError(ex); } without
I have read several interesting C#/F# comparisons here on stackoverflow. So, first of all,
I have read several topics (like this one: Database field containing HTML display raw
I have read several documentations about building custom ErrorHandler (by inheriting from IErrorHandler). Unfortunately,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.