Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7194845
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 28, 20262026-05-28T20:27:27+00:00 2026-05-28T20:27:27+00:00

I have read that ConcurrentDictionary only locks when writing, so the reads are lock

  • 0

I have read that ConcurrentDictionary only locks when writing, so the reads are lock free.

http://blogs.msdn.com/b/pfxteam/archive/2010/01/08/9945809.aspx
reads on the dictionary are performed in a lock-free manner

But what about visibility, how do they ensure this when the reads are lock free?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-28T20:27:28+00:00Added an answer on May 28, 2026 at 8:27 pm

    The use of the MemoryBarrier ensures that the objects are ‘published’ for other threads. This does not require a lock.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have read that dealloc for an object will be called, only if retain
I have read that free() generally does not return memory to the OS. Can
I have read that 302 HTTP errors are not supposed to appear frequently even
I have read that web services are transmitted through SOAP over HTTP. Then what
I have read that PHPs probable weakness is how it handles concurrency. With only
I have read that R uses only a single CPU. How can I let
I have read that a HTTP server created in node.js does not create new
I have read that using database keys in a URL is a bad thing
I have read that while plug-ins are not supported for SQL Server Management Studio,
I have read that private variables in a base class are technically inherited by

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.