Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7443577
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 29, 20262026-05-29T11:21:05+00:00 2026-05-29T11:21:05+00:00

I have read that creating a temporary table is best if the number of

  • 0

I have read that creating a temporary table is best if the number of parameters passed in the IN criteria is large. This is for select queries. Does this hold true for update queries as well ?? I have an update query which uses 3 table joins (Inner Joins) and passes 1000 parameters in the IN criteria and this query runs in a loop for 200 or more times. Which is the best approach to execute this query ?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-29T11:21:06+00:00Added an answer on May 29, 2026 at 11:21 am

    IN operations are usually slow. Passing 1000 parameters to any query sounds awful. If you can avoid that, do it. Now, I’d really have a go with the temp table. You can even play with the indexing of the table. I mean, instead of just putting values in it, play with the indexes that would help you optimize your searches.

    On the other hand, adding with indexes is slower that adding without indexes. Go for an empiric test there. Now, what I think is a must, bear in mind that when using the other table you don’t need to use the IN clause because you can use the EXISTS clause which results usually in better performance. I.E.:

    select * from yourTable yt
    where exists (
        select * from yourTempTable ytt
        where yt.id = ytt.id
    )
    

    I don’t know your query, nor data, but that would give you an idea about how to do it. Note the inner select * is as fast as select aSingleField, as the database engine optimizes it.

    Those are all my thoughts. But remember, to be 100% sure of what is best for your problem, there is nothing like performing both tests and timing them 🙂 Hope this help.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have read that you can do it, but would this really improve performance
I have read that it will allow creating an Android app without (much) programming
I have always read that creating threads is expensive. I also know that you
I am creating a new URL shortener and have read that a Bijective function
I have read that using database keys in a URL is a bad thing
I have read that while plug-ins are not supported for SQL Server Management Studio,
I have read that private variables in a base class are technically inherited by
I have read that gwt-ext is slow and it seems too bulky. How does
I have read that 'Normal' ARM instructions are fixed length - 32 bits. And
I have read that LinkedHashMap has faster iteration speed than HashMap because its elements

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.