Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6244445
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T12:19:39+00:00 2026-05-24T12:19:39+00:00

I have read that F# is smart enough to convert out parameter of a

  • 0

I have read that F# is smart enough to convert out parameter of a method to tuple. For example:

let isInt s =
  match System.Int32.TryParse(s) with
  | (false, _) -> false
  | (true, _) -> true

I want to create a new Mutex with unique system-wide name. There’s a constructor with 3 parameters:

new: 
    initiallyOwned:bool * 
    name:string * 
    createdNew:bool byref -> Mutex

Last parameter is out parameter and F# should be able to convert constructor call result to a tuple.
Nevertheless the following code looks fails to compile with the error “This expression was expected to have type Mutex but here has type ‘a * ‘b“

open System.Threading

let rec CreateUniqueMutex i =
    match new Mutex(false, i.ToString()) with
    | (_, false) -> CreateUniqueMutex (i+1) // Error here
    | (mutex, true) -> mutex

What is the difference with the first isInt method?

Can my code be fixed?

What would be the best-looking code for my task?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T12:19:40+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 12:19 pm

    The difference is that there are multiple overloads of the Mutex constructor, so the compiler thinks that you’re calling the overload which takes exactly two arguments. Your best bet is to declare a mutable local and use that:

    let rec createUniqueMutex i =
        let mutable b = false
        let mutex = new Mutex(false, string i, &b)
        if b then mutex else createUniqueMutex (i+1)
    

    Note that I’ve fixed a few other issues with your code. In particular, you need to use let rec to define a recursive function and you need to parenthesize (i+1).

    Edit

    Just to show that this would work if it weren’t for the overloads:

    type MyType(x:string, [<System.Runtime.InteropServices.Out>]y:int byref) =
        do y <- 3
        member __.X = x
    
    let (myT, n) = MyType("test")
    

    As a minor point, note that the tuples in your match statement are backwards: the return value comes first, so they should be (_,false) and (mutex, true).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have read that to match a word inside of a string using Regular
I have read that GLSL (specifically v1.0.17: my application is running under WebGL) compilers
I have read that in Java interfaces can't be instantiated ( in the documentation,
I have read that you should keep the number of connections in your database
I have read that for enabling the auto return I have to enable this
I have read that you can do it, but would this really improve performance
I have read that gwt-ext is slow and it seems too bulky. How does
I have read that 'Normal' ARM instructions are fixed length - 32 bits. And
I have read that LinkedHashMap has faster iteration speed than HashMap because its elements
I have read that most languages are becoming more and more like lisp, adopting

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.