Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6789693
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T17:38:06+00:00 2026-05-26T17:38:06+00:00

I have read that grouping happens before ordering, is there any way that I

  • 0

I have read that grouping happens before ordering, is there any way that I can order first before grouping without having to wrap my whole query around another query just to do this?

Let’s say I have this data:

id  | user_id | date_recorded
1   | 1       | 2011-11-07
2   | 1       | 2011-11-05    
3   | 1       | 2011-11-06
4   | 2       | 2011-11-03
5   | 2       | 2011-11-06

Normally, I’d have to do this query in order to get what I want:

SELECT
*
FROM (
    SELECT * FROM table ORDER BY date_recorded DESC
) t1
GROUP BY t1.user_id

But I’m wondering if there’s a better solution.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T17:38:06+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 5:38 pm

    Your question is somewhat unclear but I have a suspicion what you really want is not any GROUP aggregates at all, but rather ordering by date first, then user ID:

    SELECT
      id, 
      user_id, 
      date_recorded
    FROM tbl
    ORDER BY date_recorded DESC, user_id ASC
    

    Here would be the result. Note reordering by date_recorded from your original example

    id  | user_id | date_recorded
    1   | 1       | 2011-11-07
    3   | 1       | 2011-11-06
    2   | 1       | 2011-11-05    
    5   | 2       | 2011-11-06
    4   | 2       | 2011-11-03
    

    Update

    To retrieve the full latest record per user_id, a JOIN is needed. The subquery (mx) locates the latest date_recorded per user_id, and that result is joined to the full table to retrieve the remaining columns.

    SELECT 
      mx.user_id,
      mx.maxdate,
      t.id
    FROM (
      SELECT
        user_id,
        MAX(date_recorded) AS maxdate
      FROM tbl
      GROUP BY user_id
    ) mx JOIN tbl t ON mx.user_id = t.user_id AND mx.date_recorded = t.date_recorded
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have read that in Java interfaces can't be instantiated ( in the documentation,
I have read that you can do it, but would this really improve performance
I have read that : Searching for a substring, pat[1..m], in txt[1..n], can be
I have read that R uses only a single CPU. How can I let
I have read that, when using react, all actors can execute in a single
I have read that HttpURLConnection supports persistent connections, so that a connection can be
I have read that GLSL (specifically v1.0.17: my application is running under WebGL) compilers
I have read that you should keep the number of connections in your database
I have read that for enabling the auto return I have to enable this
I have read that gwt-ext is slow and it seems too bulky. How does

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.