Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6823913
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T21:50:23+00:00 2026-05-26T21:50:23+00:00

I have read that it is possible to extend static classes in F#, though

  • 0

I have read that it is possible to extend static classes in F#, though it was not yet possible in C#. Multiple workarounds are proposed and therefore suggesting that this type of extension could be reasonably useful.

Though the extension methods are defined as static, they work on type instances being extended.

Because nothing allows me to think it is now available, I was wondering whether such feature is now made doable to extend a static class using the extension methods syntax in C# in .NET 4.0+?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T21:50:24+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 9:50 pm

    Augmenting static classes with extension methods probably won’t be possible in C# in the reasonable future, unless the language changes the way extension methods are declared.

    Imagine we have to add this feature to the language. Extension methods are currently defined as static methods taking an additional parameter decorated with the this keyword:

    public class Foo
    {
    }
    
    public static class ExtensionMethods
    {
        public static void ExtendFoo(this Foo foo, string bar)
        {
        }
    }
    

    In the code above, the this decorator is the only thing that instructs the compiler to treat ExtendFoo() as an extension method that augments class Foo. In other words, we cannot get rid of parameter foo, which will refer to the instance of Foo to which the extension method will apply, i.e. the equivalent of this if the method was native to Foo. Problem is, static classes cannot be instantiated, so what are we going to pass in that parameter?

    We can handwave the problem away and enact that if Foo is static, then the compiler should emit code that passes null instead of an actual instance of Foo (that cannot exist anyway). But that would be an obvious kludge, and probably shouldn’t be part of the language for this reason only. Expect NullReferenceExceptions all over the place otherwise.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have read that its not possible to cancel an active ajax request, however
Multiple Inheritance in ActionScript 3? Is it possible? I have read somewhere that it
I have read in several places that it's possible to share the objects directory
I have read that while plug-ins are not supported for SQL Server Management Studio,
I have read that it is possible with Tomcat 5.5+ to deploy a war
I have read that using database keys in a URL is a bad thing
I have read that private variables in a base class are technically inherited by
I have read that you can do it, but would this really improve performance
I have read that gwt-ext is slow and it seems too bulky. How does
I have read that 'Normal' ARM instructions are fixed length - 32 bits. And

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.