Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8129853
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 6, 20262026-06-06T08:27:43+00:00 2026-06-06T08:27:43+00:00

I have read this question and the simple and clear answer but it’s not

  • 0

I have read this question and the simple and clear answer but it’s not useful in my case because the answer don’t consider the nested for. please, see the code:

class SuperCat(ndb.Model):

class Category(ndb.Model):
  supercat = ndb.KeyProperty(kind=SuperCat)

class SubCat(ndb.Model):
  category = ndb.KeyProperty(kind=Category)

handler:

Categories = ndb.gql("SELECT * FROM Category WHERE supercat = :1", supercat_key)
self.generate('supercat.html', {'Categories': Categories})

in template, with the old db.Model and the back-reference property this is enough:

{{ for Category in Categories }}
  {{ for SubCat in Category.subcat_set }} # this is the back-reference in action

What is the equally simple alternative to serve such data structure?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-06T08:27:45+00:00Added an answer on June 6, 2026 at 8:27 am

    Let’s look at this systematically. First, the db->ndb translation guide tells us that the query returning SubCategory instances for a given Category instance is as follows:

      subcats_query = SubCategory.query(SubCategory.category == cat.key)
    

    (Note that I use lowercase names for instances/entities and CapWords for classes/models. So cat is a Category entity.)

    So in Python, we would write your double loop as follows:

      for cat in categories:
        for subcat in SubCat.query(SubCat.category == cat.key):
          ...blah...
    

    In order to turn this into something that’s easily accessible from the template, let’s define a new method on the Category class:

      class Category(ndb.Model):
    
        supercat = ndb.KeyProperty(kind=SuperCat)
    
        def subcat_set(self):
          return SubCat.query(SubCat.category == self.key)
    

    Note that this is a method; in Python, you have to call it:

      for cat in categories:
        for subcat in cat.subcat_set():
          ...blah...
    

    But in a template you can (must) leave out the () call syntax, so you get what you want:

      {{ for cat in categories }}
        {{ for subcat in cat.subcat_set }}
          ...blah...
    

    Give it a try!

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have read this question but it's not quite what I was looking for.
I was reading this question (which you do not have to read because I
My question is in relation this this answer. https://stackoverflow.com/a/8773953/1297775 I have read at many
Before you -1 this for being such a simple question read further, because ive
I imagine this is not a very specific programming question. But have you tried
All this might look too trivial but read it through - I have simple
This is not a simple question its just because i'm rethinking our architecture for
I have read numerous people with this question and have tried numerous strategies. However,
I have read some different responses for this same question, so I dont know
I have searched here, GooBingHooVista'd the world and read this related question for VS

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.