Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 649057
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T21:54:04+00:00 2026-05-13T21:54:04+00:00

I have seen a few times people using -1 as opposed to 0 when

  • 0

I have seen a few times people using -1 as opposed to 0 when working with neural networks for the input data. How is this better and does it effect any of the mathematics to implement it?

Edit: Using feedforward and back prop

Edit 2: I gave it a go but the network stopped learning so I assume the maths would have to change somewhere?

Edit 3: Finally found the answer. The mathematics for binary is different to bipolar. See my answer below.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T21:54:05+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 9:54 pm

    Recently found that the sigmoid and sigmoid derivative formula needs to change if using bipolar over binary.

    Bipolar Sigmoid Function: f(x) = -1 + 2 / (1 + e^-x)

    Bipolar Sigmoid Derivative: f’(x) = 0.5 * (1 + f(x)) * (1 – f(x) )

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have seen this question pop up a few times but the authors see
I have seen the reverse of this question quite a few times, but have
I have seen this question asked a few times but I have not seen
I have seen this question answered a few times in which it is suggested
I have seen this question asked a few times on SO - but the
I have seen this mentioned a few times and I am not clear on
I have seen a few posts regarding this issue but not one specific to
I'm installing it now. I've seen a few videos where people have Resharper installed
I am trying to mimic something that I have seen a few different times.
I've seen this question rise here and there a few times, but I never

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.