Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8466473
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 10, 20262026-06-10T15:21:14+00:00 2026-06-10T15:21:14+00:00

I have seen const used twice in the declaration of a static array before

  • 0

I have seen const used twice in the declaration of a static array before and now that I am creating my own static array I am wondering why const would be needed twice in some situations.

Does having an array of pointers make a difference?

a. static const TYPE name[5];
b. static const TYPE const name[5];

c. static const TYPE* name[5];
d. static const TYPE* const name[5];

My understanding is that b. is invalid, but if using const twice is valid, what is its purpose?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-10T15:21:15+00:00Added an answer on June 10, 2026 at 3:21 pm
    const TYPE* x;
    

    Means that the thing that x points at is const.

    TYPE* const x;
    

    Means that the pointer x is const.

    Combining the 2 you get:

    const TYPE* const x;
    

    Meaning the pointer and the thing pointed to are both const.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have seen this on a program that I am tinkering: static const void
I have seen these two approaches for constant declaration which are to be used
I have seen solutions like this: kernel dp_square (const float *a, float *result) {
I have seen some people in SO commenting that Singleton Pattern is an anti-pattern.
I have seen behaviour in Perforce that I am unable to explain. I took
I have never used PHP with CLI, but I have seen scripts running with
I have an application that connects to a database and can be used in
I've often used pointers to const objects, like so... const int *p; That simply
I have this API that requires me to have a specific array key to
I have seen many references stating that TableAdapters are weak and silly, and that

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.