Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7620169
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 31, 20262026-05-31T03:52:26+00:00 2026-05-31T03:52:26+00:00

I have seen Ruby code that raises exceptions using a class: raise GoatException, Maximum

  • 0

I have seen Ruby code that raises exceptions using a class:

raise GoatException,    "Maximum of 3 goats per bumper car."

Other code uses an instance:

raise GoatException.new "No leotard found suitable for goat."

Both of these are rescued the same way. Is there any reason to use an instance vs a class?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-31T03:52:28+00:00Added an answer on May 31, 2026 at 3:52 am

    It makes no difference; the exception class will be instiantiated in either case.

    If you provide a string, either as the argument to new or as the second argument to raise, it be passed to initialize and will become the exception instance’s .message.

    For example:

    class GoatException < StandardError
      def initialize(message)
        puts "initializing with message: #{message}"
        super
      end
    end
    
    begin
      raise GoatException.new "Goats do not enjoy origami." #--|
                                                            #  | Equivilents
      raise GoatException,    "Goats do not enjoy origami." #--|
    rescue Exception => e
      puts "Goat exception! The class is '#{e.class}'. Message is '#{e.message}'"
    end
    

    If you comment the first raise above, you’ll see that:

    • In both cases, initialize is called.
    • In both cases, the exception class is GoatException, not class as it would be if we were rescuing the exception class itself.
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have seen this in a lot of code written using Ruby-on-Rails. It seems
I have seen many samples of Ruby code with this line (for example, http://www.sinatrarb.com/
I have seen alot of frameworks that generate stub applications, like Ruby on Rails
I have seen this question about deploying to WebSphere using the WAS ant tasks.
I have seen that Windows system use temporary files to increase the performance of
I have seen code like this (actually seeing another person type it up): catch
I have just seen the news that a person has left Apple to develop
Languages that have closures, such as Ruby, enable elegant constructs to transform lists. Suppose
I have never seen this being done anywhere in all the source code i've
I've seen how to overload + and * in Ruby, so that my_obj +

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.