Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6668423
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T03:02:25+00:00 2026-05-26T03:02:25+00:00

I have seen some Apple examples that do call [super viewDidUnload]; and some that

  • 0

I have seen some Apple examples that do call [super viewDidUnload]; and some that don’t. I read an article (a few months ago so I dont recall the url) that said calling [super viewDidUnload]; was unnecessary but it didn’t explain beyond that.

Is there a definitive reason why or why not to tell super that the viewDidUnload?
And, (if it should be done) do I call super before setting all my properties to nil, after, or does it matter?

- (void)viewDidUnload {
    // Is this necessary?
    // [super viewDidUnload];

    self.tableDataSource = nil;
    self.titleLabel = nil;

    // Is it better to call super before or after nil'ing properties?
    // [super viewDidUnload];
}

Thanks!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T03:02:25+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 3:02 am

    1- Is there a definitive reason why or why not to tell super that the viewDidUnload?

    Honestly I don’t know the consequences of not calling it. You can try to not call it and everything works smooth, but imagine that Apple adds some importante piece of code that will run when [super viewDidUnload] is called, what will happen now? Bad things will happen probably and you will spend precious time trying to solve your problem. My rule is: when overriding, call the super.

    2 – Do I call super before setting all my properties to nil, after, or does it matter?

    It does matter, I have watched bad things happen when I called [super dealloc] before releasing my objects. The same way I saw my UI being slow because I did my calculations before [super viewDidLoad]. It always depend of what you want to achieve.

    Bottom line, what I do in my projects for viewDidUnload is:

    //release my views

    [super viewDidUnload];

    As for iOS6:

    The method has been deprecated.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have seen a few questions that are like mine, but none that actually
Have seen some similar questions: What is the difference between a JavaBean and a
I have seen some very weird for loops when reading other people's code. I
I have seen some websites use the following tag: <meta type=title content=Title of the
I have seen some C++ classes with a destructor defined as follows: class someClass
I have seen some mails which has HTML content embedded in them. The content
I have seen some instances where people will say you have to use JS
i have seen some hand rolled solutions but does jquery out of the box
I have seen some developers use the return statement in a catch block. Why/when
Today, I have seen some legacy code. In the destructor there is a statement

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.