Question

I have several complex data structures like

Map< A, Set< B > >
Set< Map< A, B > >
Set< Map< A, Set< B > > >
Map< A, Map< B, Set< C > > >
and so on (more complex data structures)

Note: In my case it doesn’t really matter if I use Set or List.

Now I know that JAXB let me define XmlAdapter‘s, that’s fine,
but I don’t want to define an XmlAdapter for every of the given data structures
(it would be just too much copy-and-paste code).

I tried to achieve my goal by declaring two generalizing XmlAdapters:

• one for Map: MapAdapter<K,V>
• one for Set: SetAdapter<V>

The problem:
JAXB complains as following:

javax.xml.bind.JAXBException:
class java.util.Collections$UnmodifiableMap nor any of its
  super class is known to this context.

Here is my adapter class:

import java.util.*;
import javax.xml.bind.annotation.*;
import javax.xml.bind.annotation.adapters.*;

public class Adapters {

public final static class MapAdapter<K, V>
        extends XmlAdapter<MapAdapter.Adapter<K, V>, Map<K, V>> {

    @XmlType
    @XmlRootElement
    public final static class Adapter<K, V> {

        @XmlElement
        protected List<MyEntry<K, V>> key = new LinkedList<MyEntry<K, V>>();

        private Adapter() {
        }

        public Adapter(Map<K, V> original) {
            for (Map.Entry<K, V> entry : original.entrySet()) {
                key.add(new MyEntry<K, V>(entry));
            }
        }

    }

    @XmlType
    @XmlRootElement
    public final static class MyEntry<K, V> {

        @XmlElement
        protected K key;

        @XmlElement
        protected V value;

        private MyEntry() {
        }

        public MyEntry(Map.Entry<K, V> original) {
            key = original.getKey();
            value = original.getValue();
        }

    }

    @Override
    public Adapter<K, V> marshal(Map<K, V> obj) {
        return new Adapter<K, V>(obj);
    }

    @Override
    public Map<K, V> unmarshal(Adapter<K, V> obj) {
        throw new UnsupportedOperationException("unmarshalling is never performed");
    }

}

}

Here is my JUnit test case:

import java.io.*;
import java.util.*;
import javax.xml.bind.*;
import javax.xml.bind.annotation.*;
import javax.xml.bind.annotation.adapters.*;
import org.junit.*;
import static java.lang.System.*;

public class SomeTest {

@Test
public void _map2()
        throws Exception {

    Map<String, Map<String, String>> dataStructure =
            new HashMap<String, Map<String, String>>();

    Map<String, String> inner1 = new HashMap<String, String>();
    Map<String, String> inner2 = new HashMap<String, String>();

    dataStructure.put("a", inner1);
    dataStructure.put("b", inner1);

    inner1.put("a1", "1");
    inner1.put("a2", "2");
    inner2.put("b1", "1");
    inner2.put("b2", "2");

    JAXBContext context = JAXBContext.newInstance(Adapters.XMap.class,
            Adapters.XCount.class, Adapters.XEntry.class);

    Marshaller marshaller = context.createMarshaller();
    marshaller.setProperty(Marshaller.JAXB_FRAGMENT, true);
    marshaller.setProperty(Marshaller.JAXB_FORMATTED_OUTPUT, true);

    marshaller.setAdapter(new Adapters.MapAdapter());

    StringWriter sw = new StringWriter();

    marshaller.marshal(dataStructure, sw);
    out.println(sw.toString());
}

}

Answer 1

I’ve solved the problem without XmlAdapter’s.

I’ve written JAXB-annotated objects for Map, Map.Entry and Collection.
The main idea is inside the method xmlizeNestedStructure(…):

Take a look at the code:

public final class Adapters {

private Adapters() {
}

public static Class<?>[] getXmlClasses() {
    return new Class<?>[]{
                XMap.class, XEntry.class, XCollection.class, XCount.class
            };
}

public static Object xmlizeNestedStructure(Object input) {
    if (input instanceof Map<?, ?>) {
        return xmlizeNestedMap((Map<?, ?>) input);
    }
    if (input instanceof Collection<?>) {
        return xmlizeNestedCollection((Collection<?>) input);
    }

    return input; // non-special object, return as is
}

public static XMap<?, ?> xmlizeNestedMap(Map<?, ?> input) {
    XMap<Object, Object> ret = new XMap<Object, Object>();

    for (Map.Entry<?, ?> e : input.entrySet()) {
        ret.add(xmlizeNestedStructure(e.getKey()),
                xmlizeNestedStructure(e.getValue()));
    }

    return ret;
}

public static XCollection<?> xmlizeNestedCollection(Collection<?> input) {
    XCollection<Object> ret = new XCollection<Object>();

    for (Object entry : input) {
        ret.add(xmlizeNestedStructure(entry));
    }

    return ret;
}

@XmlType
@XmlRootElement
public final static class XMap<K, V> {

    @XmlElementWrapper(name = "map")
    @XmlElement(name = "entry")
    private List<XEntry<K, V>> list = new LinkedList<XEntry<K, V>>();

    public XMap() {
    }

    public void add(K key, V value) {
        list.add(new XEntry<K, V>(key, value));
    }

}

@XmlType
@XmlRootElement
public final static class XEntry<K, V> {

    @XmlElement
    private K key;

    @XmlElement
    private V value;

    private XEntry() {
    }

    public XEntry(K key, V value) {
        this.key = key;
        this.value = value;
    }

}

@XmlType
@XmlRootElement
public final static class XCollection<V> {

    @XmlElementWrapper(name = "list")
    @XmlElement(name = "entry")
    private List<V> list = new LinkedList<V>();

    public XCollection() {
    }

    public void add(V obj) {
        list.add(obj);
    }

}

}

It works!

Let’s look at a demo output:

<xMap>
    <map>
        <entry>
            <key xsi:type="xCount" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
                <count>1</count>
                <content xsi:type="xs:string" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">a</content>
            </key>
            <value xsi:type="xCollection" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
                <list>
                    <entry xsi:type="xs:string" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">a1</entry>
                    <entry xsi:type="xs:string" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">a2</entry>
                    <entry xsi:type="xs:string" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">a3</entry>
                </list>
            </value>
        </entry>
        <entry>
            <key xsi:type="xCount" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
                <count>2</count>
                <content xsi:type="xs:string" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">b</content>
            </key>
            <value xsi:type="xCollection" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
                <list>
                    <entry xsi:type="xs:string" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">b1</entry>
                    <entry xsi:type="xs:string" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">b3</entry>
                    <entry xsi:type="xs:string" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">b2</entry>
                </list>
            </value>
        </entry>
        <entry>
            <key xsi:type="xCount" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
                <count>3</count>
                <content xsi:type="xs:string" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">c</content>
            </key>
            <value xsi:type="xCollection" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
                <list>
                    <entry xsi:type="xs:string" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">c1</entry>
                    <entry xsi:type="xs:string" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">c2</entry>
                    <entry xsi:type="xs:string" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">c3</entry>
                </list>
            </value>
        </entry>
    </map>
</xMap>

Sorry, the demo output uses also a data structure called “count”
which is not mentioned in the Adapter’s source code.

BTW: does anyone know how to remove all these annoying
and (in my case) unnecessary xsi:type attributes?