Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6540151
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T10:56:37+00:00 2026-05-25T10:56:37+00:00

I have several database access methods that are wrapped in a try/catch block: function

  • 0

I have several database access methods that are wrapped in a try/catch block:

function GetAll() {
    try {
        entityLoad("Book");
    }
    catch (any e) {
        throw (type="CustomException", message="Error accessing database, could not read");
    }
}

function Save(Book book) {
    try {
        entitySave(book);
    }
    catch (any e) {
        throw (type="CustomException", message="Error accessing database, could not save);
    }
}

As you can see, the try/catch block is repeated several times, where the only thing that varies is the message. Is it possible to create a delegate in ColdFusion so that I can do something like this instead (using a C# lambda to represent an anonymous delegate)?:

function GetAll() {
    DatabaseOperation(() => entityLoad("Book"), "could not read");
}

function Save(Book book) {
    DatabaseOperation(() => entitySave(book), "could not save");
}

function DatabaseOperation(delegate action, string error) {
    try {
        action.invoke();
    }
    catch (any e) {
        var message = "Error accessing database, " & error;
        throw (type="CustomException", message=message);
    }
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T10:56:38+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 10:56 am

    Based on your example, not with CF9.

    Closures are coming in CF10 which will probably allow you to do something like:

    function GetAll() {
        DatabaseOperation( closure(){ entityLoad("Book") } , "could not read");
    }
    
    function Save(Book book) {
        DatabaseOperation( closure(){ entitySave(book) } , "could not save");
    }
    
    function DatabaseOperation(closure action, string error) {
        try {
            action();
        }
        catch (any e) {
            var message = "Error accessing database, " & error;
            throw (type="CustomException", message=message);
        }
    }
    

    (syntax might vary, don’t remember if it was exactly like that)

    Alternatively, you could probably use evaluate here, I guess…

    function GetAll() {
        DatabaseOperation( 'entityLoad("Book")' , "could not read");
    }
    
    function Save(Book book) {
        DatabaseOperation( 'entitySave(book)' , "could not save");
    }
    
    function DatabaseOperation(string action, string error) {
        try {
            evaluate(action);
        }
        catch (any e) {
            var message = "Error accessing database, " & error;
            throw (type="CustomException", message=message);
        }
    }
    

    Personally I would just remove the try/catch and use onError in Application.cfc – doesn’t seem to be useful to mask the original error and instead throw a more generic one?

    Update: two more possible alternatives…

    Another option that currently works is to have a public wrapper function, that calls the DatabaseOperation function, passing in the name of a private function that does the actual logic like this:

    function GetAll() {
        DatabaseOperation( real_GetAll , Arguments , "could not read");
    }
    private function real_GetAll() {
        entityLoad("Book")
    }
    
    function Save(Book book) {
        DatabaseOperation( real_Save , Arguments , "could not save");
    }
    private function real_Save(Book book) {
        entitySave(book)
    }
    
    function DatabaseOperation(any action, struct args , string error) {
        try {
            action( argumentcollection=args )
        }
        catch (any e) {
            var message = "Error accessing database, " & error;
            throw (type="CustomException", message=message);
        }
    }
    

    If you don’t like the idea of defining functions twice, but don’t mind obscuring the API, you could set the methods to private then use onMissingMethod:

    private function GetAll()
    {
        entityLoad("Book")
    }
    
    private function Save(Book book)
    {
        entitySave(book)
    }
    
    function onMissingMethod( string MethodName , struct MethodArgs )
    {
        if ( NOT StructKeyExists(Variables,Arguments.MethodName) )
        {
            throw("The method #Arguments.MethodName# was not found");
        }
    
        try
        {
            var Meth = Variables[Arguments.MethodName];
            Meth( ArgumentCollection=Arguments.MethodArgs );
        }
        catch(any e)
        {
            var message = "Error accessing database, ";
    
            switch(MethodName)
            {
                case "GetAll":
                    message &= "could not read";
                break;
                case "Save":
                    message &= "could not save";
                break;
            }
    
            throw (type="CustomException,message=message);
        }
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have several queries in an MS Access database that I am rewriting in
I have an Access database (in Access 2003) with several tables, and data must
I have several database tables that just contain a single column and very few
I have several sql queries that I simply want to fire at the database.
Our scenario: We have a main database that stores company-wide information. We have several
I have a ASP.NET web application that use the same DataContextType to access several
We have several applications that are installed in several departments that interact with database
I have an access 2007 Database that outputs a report in excel format, the
I have inherited a terribly written MS Access database that I need to import
I have some status data that I want to cache from a database. Any

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.