Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 151443
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T09:27:02+00:00 2026-05-11T09:27:02+00:00

I have several threads that acquire Mutexes and then terminate. The mutexes are stored

  • 0

I have several threads that acquire Mutexes and then terminate.

The mutexes are stored in a main repository, and are properly released when the program exists. However, when the thread that allocated a Mutex exists, the mutex gets released automatically, and subsequent acquire AbandonedMutexException (also according to the documentation).

How can I avoid this exception, and keep using a Mutex even after the allocating thread finished? Is there another, more appropriate synchronization construct in .Net that doesn’t have this limitation.

Note – I am looking for a cross-process synch mechanism with similar semantics to Mutex.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T09:27:02+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 9:27 am

    Looks like EventWaitHandle does what I want. It has a constructor that takes a name, so it’s perfect for cross-process synch, and it doesn’t have this problem.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

My program have several worker threads that calling a function in a dynamically loaded
Where is the TickCount() call? I have seen several threads on the web that
I have a queue structure that is being used by several pthreads. The threads
I have several threads that write to the same int. Each thread increment the
I have a TObjectList that needs to be processed by several threads. Since internally
I have a simple console application that runs calculations in several threads (10-20 of
I have a test application in c++ starting several threads in its main() and
I realize that there have already been several threads on this type of question,
I have a generic class called lockingValue that may be referenced by several threads.
I'm writing a CPU intensive program in C++ that has several threads needing to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.