Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 372301
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T14:11:51+00:00 2026-05-12T14:11:51+00:00

I have some C# code that walks XML schemata using the Xml.Schema classes from

  • 0

I have some C# code that walks XML schemata using the Xml.Schema classes from the .NET framework. The various simple type restrictions are abstracted in the framework as a whole bunch of classes derived from Xml.Schema.XmlSchemaFacet. Unless there is something I’ve missed, the only way to know which of the derived facet types a given facet is, is to speculatively cast it to one of them, catching the resultant InvalidCastOperation in case of failure. Doing this leaves me with a really ugly function like this:

private void NavigateFacet(XmlSchemaFacet facet)
{
    try
    {
        handler.Length((XmlSchemaLengthFacet)facet);
    }
    catch(InvalidCastException)
    {
        try
        {
            handler.MinLength((XmlSchemaMinLengthFacet)facet);
        }
        catch(InvalidCastException)
        {
            try
            {
                handler.MaxLength((XmlSchemaMaxLengthFacet)facet);
            }
            catch(InvalidCastException)
            {
                ...
            }
        }
    }
}

I assume there must be more elegant ways to do this; either using some property I’ve missed from the .NET framework, or with some clever piece of OO trickery. Can anyone enlighten me?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T14:11:51+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 2:11 pm

    Because I prefer debugging data to debugging code, I’d do it like this, especially if the code had to handle all of the XmlSchemaFacet subclasses:

    Dictionary<Type, Action<XmlSchemaFacet>> HandlerMap = 
       new Dictionary<Type, Action<XmlSchemaFacet>>
    {
       {typeof(XmlSchemaLengthFacet), handler.Length},
       {typeof(XmlSchemaMinLengthFacet), handler.MinLength},
       {typeof(XmlSchemaMaxLengthFacet), handler.MaxLength}
    };
    
    HandlerMap[facet.GetType()](facet);
    

    This’ll throw a KeyNotFoundException if facet isn’t of a known type. Note that all of the handler methods will have to cast their argument from XmlSchemaFacet, so you’re probably not saving on total lines of code, but you’re definitely saving on the number of paths through your code.

    There also comes a point where (assuming that the map is pre-built) mapping types to methods with a dictionary will be faster than traversing a linear list of types, which is essentially what using a bunch of if blocks gets you.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 417k
  • Answers 417k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer yes ...you can do it by seperating it through comma's... May 15, 2026 at 9:47 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You can use WMI, it is easy and it works… May 15, 2026 at 9:47 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Register a function that returns the number of times it's… May 15, 2026 at 9:47 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.